Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Lighting & Studio Techniques | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       end
  

Archive 2012 · First Try At Studio Lighting

  
 
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #1 · p.2 #1 · First Try At Studio Lighting


Diggin' the progression ...

Here's a little bit of a levels & color balance tweak along with some sharpening.







Nov 16, 2012 at 07:41 PM
BrianO
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · p.2 #2 · First Try At Studio Lighting


A definite improvement over the first and second photos, in my opinion. (I disagree with Peter on this, it would seem. I don't find that proper exposure makes for "boring" images. That's a matter of posing and expression, as well as light and shadow placement. You can do all of those things and still have proper exposure.)

The biggest change on this latest one was the color balance; much more natural looking.

Keep it up.



Nov 16, 2012 at 11:11 PM
novicesnapper
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · p.2 #3 · First Try At Studio Lighting


I agree, very nice. I think if you could get him slightly grinning but not squinting, it would fire this right up as far as emotional. Easy to see he's a squinter lol, so am I. Again, great work, moving right along.


Nov 17, 2012 at 08:33 AM
Peter Figen
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #4 · p.2 #4 · First Try At Studio Lighting


The problem with the latest effort, which does look better color and tone-wise, is that it also went back to super flat copy lighting, with one light on each side. No modeling of the shape of the face. No mood. Boring. I think this is a self portrait, which can explain the expression, which doesn't really matter at this point, as this is just an exercise in lighting and exposure at this point. First things first.

This is not to say that you can't light faces this way, as plenty are done like this, but for most images, it's not a flattering way to go - if you're trying for an image that has some emotional impact. That's why, in an earlier post, I suggested moving both lights to one side an using a fill card on the other, which creates a sense of movement and shape.




Nov 17, 2012 at 12:02 PM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #5 · p.2 #5 · First Try At Studio Lighting


Peter Figen wrote:
I suggested moving both lights to one side an using a fill card on the other, which creates a sense of movement and shape.



Given, the low output of these lights, the close distance to subject and corresponding falloff rate ... it seems to me that trying to have the light travel past the subject (i.e. farther) and reflect (even farther) will be a challenging endeavor to provide meaningful control / variation.

That being said, I'm wondering if a better approach to getting away from the "copy lighting" that Peter is referring to might be to simply vary the distance, i.e. left @ 3 feet, right @ 4 feet, etc. ... in conjunction with varying the orientation, i.e. left @ 45 degrees, right @ 15 degrees, etc.

I think the output of these continuous lights is simply too low to be of the same value using reflective strategy / approach that we are accustomed to seeing with more powerful light sources, i.e. electronic / sun / etc.

The improvement in exposure and color is certainly been a worthy one ... now it becomes modeling & creative use as you progress more, but I'd be surprised if all on one side and reflecting yields good practicality @ control/results with such a low output source. Just something to consider ... looking forward to seeing more.



Nov 17, 2012 at 12:52 PM
novicesnapper
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · p.2 #6 · First Try At Studio Lighting


I so agree RustyBug. I see photographers move and change softbox angles to subject and distances all the time, and this did occur to me as well, changing lighting angles and distances to create shadowing and depth. I shared some of my images with Ken for comparison, and he agreed they don't look flat at all. There is no green caste as some claim and no strobing' banding effect on mine. I like the potential on this as well and think Ken is closing in on a great solution. I personally like low key rich warm images. I'm looking forward to seeing more of his work.


Nov 17, 2012 at 11:26 PM
1      
2
       end




FM Forums | Lighting & Studio Techniques | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username       Or Reset password



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.