Seems like a rather nondescript and unrecognizable random form without pattern. Even knowing what it is, it's hard to tell what it is to associate the elements.
I get the chaos of a scrum concept, but I think it falls in "no man's land" between literal vs. interpretive.
RustyBug wrote:
Seems like a rather nondescript and unrecognizable random form without pattern. Even knowing what it is, it's hard to tell what it is to associate the elements.
I get the chaos of a scrum concept, but I think it falls in "no man's land" between literal vs. interpretive.
So, this is interesting.
I agree with Kent AND Karen!
I think monotone was the right choice here, simplifying the image into shapes, tension, and the tight formation of the scrum.
Thank you for your thoughts. I had not thought but yes, familiarity with the sport would help.
My thoughts? An enigma that portrays the tensions of the moment, prompting a second and third look. Certainly not a fall-into-your-lap-ho-hum piece. A visual challenge.
Interpretive art is Difficult to convey to the masses... This is simply because of various levels of acceptance... As one likes coffee, another wants tea... If your niche is interpretive do not give up, there is an audience awaiting ... That said, I prefer Karen's rework as it brings into focus the interactions of the sport... Jim
Yes I prefer Karen's re-work also. I appreciate your looking and the feedback.
Genre? I tire of the same old thing, even family images, so like to venture in other directions occasionally. I would imagine viewers do too. If we don't try, we'll never know.
Plus, I like to stir the pot on occasion too (entertain ones self).
Thanks for your thoughts - missed the lint, debris or whatever, line is a botched clone job in LR - should have taken the moment to use CS6. Happy you like the image.
