jcolman
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
|
| p.2 #1 · Moscow wedding. Anna and Horen | |
Aleksandras Babicius wrote:
jcolman wrote:
Aleksandras Babicius wrote:
Thanks, friends!
This wedding I photographed without additional light. Only available light.
I use Nikon D3 and D4. Lenses: Nikkor 85/1.4, 24/1.4, 14-24/2.8 and SIGMA 50/1.4
Not quite true.  I saw a number of video lights set up in the reception shots.
On this wedding I didn't use any additional light. You believe, I have a motive you to deceive? But on a banquet, of course, there were MANY different lamps. It is actually concert hall.
P.S. I have no video light in general. I don't love it in principle.
No, I am not questioning you at all. But it looks like the video crew did all the lighting in the banquet hall for you. That's why it's not what I consider true "available light", as there was clearly someone who set up some lights for the event. I'm simply pointing out the obvious for people who think they can get similar results with out using any specialized lighting.
|
the team didn't use video light. Friends, you imagine a concert hall? There are a lot of various lamps which shine from the different parties. Light of various color and various brightness. Action occurs at night. A sunlight there wasn't, certainly. I didn't use any light which I somehow operated. I didn't use flashlights, didn't use video light. Anybody didn't light according to my interests. I used that lighting which was in a hall and which DID NOT DEPEND on me. Such light I call "available". Around us always there is any light. Whether what I now wrote is clear? 