Doctorbird Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
PetKal wrote:
Doctorbird wrote:
Hello Peter,
No need to praise these. Running of vocabulary.
Do you think comparable results as these can be obtained from the 400 f/2.8 + TC?
Db

Thanx dB.......400 f/2.8 IS MkII + 2xTC MkIII can do a bit better re IQ, and it will AF quite a bit faster than this combo. In addition, the OoF blur and bokeh will be deeper and more diffused, for a noticeably more pleasing overall effect .
Take a look at the pic. #1 as an example. The water ripples are breaking the yellow reflection, and I am not too keen on that. If the same scene was shot with 400 II + 2xTC MkIII, that background would have probably become a smooth and uniform coloured yellowish blur.
More reinforcement for my decision to purchase the 400+2X. Thanks.
I see. 800mm vs 600mm in focal length at the same aperture and subject distance equals less depth of field so better bokeh. Any there differences in the diaphragms that you may be alluding to?
Db
|