Thought I'd make a new thread regarding this. I'm not a "big name" or anything, but since Dirk Diggler wanted to see SOOC vs. processed images... here's one of mine from yesterday. Let's see some of yours.
Straight out of the cam on top, processed on the bottom.
This is a bit of a problem, as we get rid of the SOOC once the processed files are delivered. however, I remember posting a pair during a VSCO thread...let's go see...
So what was the point of this again? To prove something to a poster, to ourselves, or someone else? I'm not trying to stir, just curious. Are we just trying to show that supposed 'style' has little or next to nothing to do with processing?
ricardovaste wrote:
So what was the point of this again? To prove something to a poster, to ourselves, or someone else? I'm not trying to stir, just curious. Are we just trying to show that supposed 'style' has little or next to nothing to do with processing?
Personally, I don't care about the point. What I do like to see is how far I need to go to get my SOOC better. So far I have a long azz way to go
cordellwillis wrote:
Personally, I don't care about the point. What I do like to see is how far I need to go to get my SOOC better. So far I have a long azz way to go
Does this effect you though,do you feel like it adds to processing time? As long as whatever you do is consistent then I think you're good. That means locking/manual exposure, good technique etc. I think if you use decent glass, light, and expose well you havea great place to work from. Doing that through a long day in multiple lighting situations can be a challenge though...
