Upload & Sell: Off
| p.77 #2 · Sony RX1 FF Mirrorless (fixed lens) |
So, the camera has dumbiest user interface.
What about image quality? Well, the sensor is excellent: I love smooth transitions, nice tones at base ISO, low noise levels at high ISOs, it's really great.
Second, lens resolution in the center and its rendition is really great as well IMO. But distortion is noticeable and more pronounced than one of Fuji X100, which is far from perfect.
And resolution at borders doesn't look good even at f5.6.
It's smeary. I don't know what part is guilty for that: lens, or sensor, or both, but for these money (in Europe it costs twice more than Leica X2) they could do much better.
i agree a lot about the interface, though i don't care about autofocus (would be nice if it has a good face detection algorithm though...). the lack of flip up lcd is my biggest complaint from what i've seen so far. the comparison to the leica x2 is kind of silly since that has an f/4 equivalent lens. the sonnar on this seems to have zeiss's typical U field curvature where the corners are focused further than the center. near infinity image quality doesn't seem to be degraded enough in the corners for me to care from the full sized samples i've seen (though it does look like autofocus can't be trusted at infinity).