Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

Home · Register · Search · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

FM Forum Rules
Canon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews

FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell
1 2 end

Yakim Peled
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #1 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

texdr wrote:
Briefly, yes the lens is a little heavy (around 3lbs), it does seem to focus fairly quickly, and it is certainly hand-holdable for me. My main interests with my canon lens is shooting bugs and butterflies around my backyard.

Personally, I'd rather have the much lighter Tamron 180/3.5 for this. While I admire Sigma for their courage to produce it I think it's a step too long. My dream long macro lens is an even lighter and smaller 200/4 with OS and HSM.

Happy shooting,
Yakim.

Aug 22, 2012 at 10:29 PM

bemyzeke
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #2 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

Have you done AF calibration. Form the pictures you posted it seems to me that the focus is not on the subject.

Aug 22, 2012 at 10:34 PM

bemyzeke
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #3 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

Also forgot to add that with 180mm your DoF is much smaller than 100mm, so your expectation of sharpness may be different.

Aug 23, 2012 at 01:40 AM

Imagemaster
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #4 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

RCicala wrote:
Tex and Imagemaster, thank you for posting these. It's an interesting lens, although I've only shot with it a couple of times. I found the OS was excellent but the weight surprised me a bit. Looking at your images I'm wondering if we're going to see copy-to-copy variation in this one. We only got 4 copies so I don't have much of a sample size, but one of them had to go straight back for being decentered. Might just be one of those things too. Most Sigma primes are pretty well built.

Note: My shots were with the Sigma 180 f3.5., not the new f2.8 version.

Aug 23, 2012 at 02:37 AM

texdr
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #5 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

bemyzeke wrote:
Have you done AF calibration. Form the pictures you posted it seems to me that the focus is not on the subject.

I did not do calibration when I took those pictures. I agree with you that the focus was not on the subject. That was one of my frustrations. Could calibration have fixed my problems. Maybe. Or I could have sent it to Sigma and have them take a look at it.

In the end, I wasn't attached emotionally to the lens, wanted to return it while I could for a full refund, and will show a little more patience in my lens purchases next time and wait for the real experts to test the lens before I do.

Aug 24, 2012 at 02:42 AM

geniousc
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #6 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

I'm super satisfied with my 150 2.8 OS. I've had it about 6 months now. No issues whatsover, I'd buy it again. I don't need a 180mm particulary for $600 more.

Aug 24, 2012 at 03:01 AM

Yakim Peled
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #7 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

It's not just the money, it's the weight as well.

Happy shooting,
Yakim.

Aug 24, 2012 at 03:40 AM

Michael Gordon
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #8 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

Reviews finally starting to appear. Wonder if anyone else has waded into the water?

http://tinyurl.com/cjcmydu
Mike

Nov 16, 2012 at 10:53 PM

PetKal
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #9 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

Michael Gordon wrote:
Reviews finally starting to appear. Wonder if anyone else has waded into the water?

http://tinyurl.com/cjcmydu
Mike

I do not know who those people are, nor do I really care, however, their review is oddly written ( ESL ?), and their sample images are invariably way too soft even for a half decent macro lens used at "normal" focusing distances.

Nov 16, 2012 at 11:54 PM

phuang3
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #10 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

In #5 CA section, it says "When it comes to the longitudinal chromatic aberration it would be difficult to notice it even at the maximum relative aperture.", but the test image shows f/3.8. Is it a typo? I wish to see the test image @ f/2.8.

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Nov 17, 2012 at 03:21 AM

Snopchenko
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #11 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

Probably a typo.
Here's another review:
http://slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1482/cat/30

Nov 17, 2012 at 06:53 AM

abqnmusa
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #12 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

lenstip review - Sigma 180mm f2,8 macro

Nov 17, 2012 at 06:56 AM

LCPete
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #13 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

I was hoping that this lens would be good I love macro and have been considering a longer IS lens in addition to my 100L
I would do some controlled static tests on a tripod
A lens that heavy would be tricky to use handheld
Both of my sigma macros 105 and 150 are excellent so would be surprised if the new sigma is not good

Nov 17, 2012 at 08:16 AM

Snopchenko
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #14 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

By all reviews, it is.

Nov 17, 2012 at 08:04 PM

phuang3
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #15 · Sigma 180mm f2.8 Macro Alpha Review

According to the author, it's not a typo! (I asked him about it)
The test shot was taken at MFD (1:1), so the equivalent aperture will be f/3.8.
I'd love to have the Sigma, but currently an used 180/3.5L is just about 1k compared to the very new $1700 Sigma 180 macro. Someone told me that Sigma may lose 30% of its value at 1st year, and probably 50% after 3 years. It may be a better idea to have the 180/3.5L first, then switch to Sigma in few years.

Nov 18, 2012 at 01:47 PM

1 2 end
FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell 1 2 end