fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              3       end
  

Archive 2012 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be

  
 
twistedlim
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


Easy...50 1.4.


Aug 04, 2012 at 03:38 PM
Matt Lomeli
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


mttran wrote:
Matt, i have a suprise for you...only need $100 max...and use your remainder $400 for another lens get these: Vivitar Series 1 VMC 70-210mm f/3.5 Macro and PK-EOS converter
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5047/5236283679_1982cf0133_b.jpg
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5203/5217196692_750673e8d6.jpg
Here is the macro and zoom samples with 5D2:
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5086/5236772604_906c41f6aa_b.jpg
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5126/5216593985_b602e77f68_b.jpg
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5161/5217165748_1a71fac6c9_b.jpg
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5167/5217173852_60ec3b279b_b.jpg
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5202/5216562835_036d002290_b.jpg
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4089/5216547969_fced0fe3de_b.jpg
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5123/5217159230_020fdd28dd_b.jpg
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4129/5216594631_205cdd141e_b.jpg

yup....it makes most canon 70-200x run for their money


Very nice. Ok - question. I was looking online...is Vivitar mount the same as Pentax?



Aug 04, 2012 at 04:01 PM
mttran
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


Yes, get the Pentax mount for PK_EOS converter


Aug 04, 2012 at 04:07 PM
trumpet_guy
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


jaybird555 wrote:
Matt, I would definitely get a used/mint Canon 70-200 F4, and I don't think you will be disappointed.


I would recommend the same thing, along with an 18-55mm IS kit lens for wider shooting.



Aug 04, 2012 at 04:23 PM
edean
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


jaybird555 wrote:
Matt, I would definitely get a used/mint Canon 70-200 F4, and I don't think you will be disappointed.


+2



Aug 04, 2012 at 04:46 PM
bigbluebear
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


+1 on the 70-200mm

Although the vivitar mttran recommends creates AMAZING results, I'm a fan of AF



Aug 04, 2012 at 04:55 PM
gatorwesty
Offline
• •
[X]
p.2 #7 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


70-200f4, nothing else comes close for 500 beans


Aug 04, 2012 at 04:57 PM
timbop
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #8 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


mttran wrote:
Yes, get the Pentax mount for PK_EOS converter


i wouldn't really want to have to manually focus a 200mm lens on a rebel...



Aug 04, 2012 at 05:39 PM
Gary Petersen
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #9 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


85mm 1.8.


Aug 04, 2012 at 05:39 PM
erikburd
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #10 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


The 35 f/2 and 85 f/1.8 lenses are good choices.

You could probably get the 18-55 EFS, 50 f/1.8 and 55-250-EFS for close to $500 together, which is a good bang-for-the-buck set.



Aug 04, 2012 at 05:45 PM
dmacmillan
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #11 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


It's hard to not recommend the 70-200, any Canon 70-200 is great. However, to give you something else to think about, I suggest the 85mm 1.8 or the Sigma 30mm 1.4. The 30mm is in your current focal length range, but it is super fast. The 85mm is just a gorgeous portrait lens either on a crop body camera like you have or even better, on FF. It is scary sharp and has wonderful bokeh wide open. I've used my son's 30mm on my old crop body and loved it. I have the 85 and it runs neck and neck with my 70-200 f2.8 as my favorite lens, not only now, but of all the lenses I've owned or own including Leica Summicrons!


Aug 04, 2012 at 05:50 PM
Gunzorro
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #12 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


"What would you choose for your only lens? I currently have the Tamron 28-75 2.8. But would consider something with a longer or shorter "reach"."

I guess I completely misunderstood your opening post. From this, it seemed you were asking "If you could only have one lens (under $500), what would you choose?" And it looked like you were about to replace the Tamron.

Obviously from all posts, you are looking for a lens in addition to the Tamron for under $500.

Is that correct? Or am I further confused?



Aug 04, 2012 at 05:55 PM
mttran
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #13 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


datousteve wrote:
Although the vivitar mttran recommends creates AMAZING results, I'm a fan of AF


Steve, i am an AF prime shooter and it's not easy for any zoom to win my love...Vivitar does and it is only zoom i have in that range after sold my 70-200LII



Aug 04, 2012 at 06:13 PM
othfilm
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #14 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


dmacmillan wrote:
It's hard to not recommend the 70-200, any Canon 70-200 is great. However, to give you something else to think about, I suggest the 85mm 1.8 or the Sigma 30mm 1.4.


Yeah, based on the current gear, I'm guessing the OP does some level of portrait work, so anything with a fast aperture is gonna be the way to go. Both of those lenses are great suggestions from that aspect. The 70-200 would be a nice addition, but, even at 200 f/4 you might find it a little lacking as a portrait lens in terms of background blur and bokeh. And of course you'd have to have the space to be able to actually use it.

If it's not just portraits, then the non-L 100mm macro is another suggestion, just because it opens up a different path. As would something ultra-wide (Tokina, etc)



Aug 04, 2012 at 06:15 PM
mco_970
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #15 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


Contax 35-70 is a good lens on T3i - I shot that combo all last summer. It has macro function at 35mm end. The lens is very well regarded, and so easy to use with the T3i flippy screen. Hmmm. I should trade my Sony NEX for another T3i.


Aug 04, 2012 at 06:17 PM
rtread
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #16 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


Sigma 30 1.4 I just picked up one a month ago... its super sharp!! i love love LOVE this lens!


Aug 04, 2012 at 06:59 PM
Matt Lomeli
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #17 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


Gunzorro wrote:
"What would you choose for your only lens? I currently have the Tamron 28-75 2.8. But would consider something with a longer or shorter "reach"."

I guess I completely misunderstood your opening post. From this, it seemed you were asking "If you could only have one lens (under $500), what would you choose?" And it looked like you were about to replace the Tamron.

Obviously from all posts, you are looking for a lens in addition to the Tamron for under $500.

Is that correct? Or am I further confused?


You are correct. I offered that piece of info so not to "overlap". Yes, I would be adding. I love that Tamron!



Aug 04, 2012 at 07:30 PM
Suresh T
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #18 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


twistedlim wrote:
Easy...50 1.4.


+1.

Depending on what you shoot, another alternative is the 85/1.8.



Aug 05, 2012 at 02:13 AM
Frankungstein
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #19 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


Gary Petersen wrote:
85mm 1.8.



+1

JD



Aug 05, 2012 at 11:05 AM
marcus riley
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #20 · If only 1 lens under $500...what would it be


it depends on what I already have and what I need to shoot.

I really agree with lots of others though, the 70-200 f4 is probably the best value in lenses today. $500 for mint used one, and it's tough to find more performance and build quality for the price.

For wider, I think the 17-40 doesn't get the credit it deserves. I got a perfect used one for $500 last year. Great colors, sharp enough across the frame unless your printing billboards , weather sealing, easy to carry, and usm focus you can count on.

For zooms, these two would definitely offer some great $500 value.

If you shoot low light or need creative DOF, Canon has plenty of good-to-great primes for the price. I've had, or currently have, and would recommend to friends:
28mm f1.8
35mm f2
50mm f1.8
100mm f2

Sigma 30mm f1.4 was a favorite of mine when using crop, and I currently love my Sigma 50mm f1.4, after a trip to Sigma (but worth it).



Aug 05, 2012 at 11:17 AM
1              3       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              3       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account