Upload & Sell: Off
| p.18 #8 · EOS-M - Canon mirroless system |
I dunno, I find the EOS-M LOT more appealing than a NX, because the mount is far more adaptable. I personally wouldn't buy one, but that's for other reasons, I dislike the Soapbar design inherited from the P&S world and I really dislike that 18MP Canon sensor. But if I was looking to get into Mirrorless now, in the sub-$1k body range, the EOS-M would be a strong option (I'd probably still choose the NEX-5N instead, it's a lot better value, but an EOS-M and the 22/2 would be a rather nice little kit).
Yeah, that's why I said "much" more appealing. The EOS M will be better for adapting lenses, but the NX line has a really solid native lens line. Plus, you can't adapt Leica M and Contax G on NX, but you can adapt LTM and SLR lenses, so NX is still pretty adaptable overall. Either way, for adapted lenses, NEX is still the better option.