Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              33      
34
       35              42       43       end
  

Archive 2012 · NEX Discussion Thread
  
 
Phillip Reeve
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #1 · p.34 #1 · NEX Discussion Thread


sebboh wrote:
no macro test for the macros?

there's a fair bit of purple fringing on the vivitar at wide apertures...

winter is coming. so i might also find time for an macro macro test

anyway, here is the 24mm comparison:



Oct 26, 2012 at 08:03 PM
jonrock
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #2 · p.34 #2 · NEX Discussion Thread


If you guys are interested in the 35mm f1.8 OSS for the NEX, there's a review up a ephotozine.com.

http://www.ephotozine.com/article/sony-e-35mm-f-1-8-oss-lens-review-20665



Nov 13, 2012 at 01:27 PM
sebboh
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #3 · p.34 #3 · NEX Discussion Thread


jonrock wrote:
If you guys are interested in the 35mm f1.8 OSS for the NEX, there's a review up a ephotozine.com.

http://www.ephotozine.com/article/sony-e-35mm-f-1-8-oss-lens-review-20665


looks pretty solid, i do kinda like the idea of having a stabilized lens...



Nov 13, 2012 at 03:48 PM
jonrock
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #4 · p.34 #4 · NEX Discussion Thread


sebboh wrote:
looks pretty solid, i do kinda like the idea of having a stabilized lens...


It looks decent though I'm curious to see how it compares to the Zeiss 32mm f1.8 that's supposed to come out later on in 2013.



Nov 13, 2012 at 03:52 PM
Jeff Kott
Online
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.34 #5 · p.34 #5 · NEX Discussion Thread


jonrock wrote:
It looks decent though I'm curious to see how it compares to the Zeiss 32mm f1.8 that's supposed to come out later on in 2013.


Yep, I'm waiting to see how this one performs too. It doesn't seem like much, but I actually will prefer the 32mm FOV to the 35. I do notice a difference in framing between my Pentax 31/1.8 and my CV 35/1.2.



Nov 13, 2012 at 05:45 PM
alwang
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #6 · p.34 #6 · NEX Discussion Thread


Yeah, I'm pretty torn. If the Zeiss lens is going to cost twice as much, not have OSS, and potentially not be supported by the on-sensor PDAF, it's going to have to be spectacular quality-wise. On the other hand, while there are no obvious flaws in these samples from the Sony 35/1.8, I can't say the rendering is particularly speaking to me either. It doesn't seem to have much 3D pop.


Nov 13, 2012 at 06:33 PM
xbarcelo
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #7 · p.34 #7 · NEX Discussion Thread


I'm sort of wishfully hoping that the Contax G autofocus adapter will allow me to use the Planar 35/2 instead of any of those two as an autofocus lens… Here's hope!


Nov 13, 2012 at 06:48 PM
sebboh
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #8 · p.34 #8 · NEX Discussion Thread


xbarcelo wrote:
I'm sort of wishfully hoping that the Contax G autofocus adapter will allow me to use the Planar 35/2 instead of any of those two as an autofocus lens… Here's hope!


while i do really like the look of the g35 from f/4 to f/11, i'm sure the new sony and zeiss will be sharper everywhere.



Nov 13, 2012 at 08:06 PM
xbarcelo
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #9 · p.34 #9 · NEX Discussion Thread


I don't doubt it, but when I want sharp, I'll use the Contax G 28 2,8…


Nov 13, 2012 at 08:11 PM
sebboh
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #10 · p.34 #10 · NEX Discussion Thread


xbarcelo wrote:
I don't doubt it, but when I want sharp, I'll use the Contax G 28 2,8…


fair enough, i just prefer the g28 in all regards including focal length and don't really like the way the g35 looks wide open in most situations. everybody has their preferences.



Nov 13, 2012 at 08:19 PM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



xbarcelo
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #11 · p.34 #11 · NEX Discussion Thread


Indeed. I'm quite the opposite. I'm not sure why, but I prefer how the planar draws… I know I'm in the minority here, because it seems that everybody else swears by the 28.


Nov 13, 2012 at 08:32 PM
Krosavcheg
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #12 · p.34 #12 · NEX Discussion Thread


Anyone had chance to play with NEX-6 extensively? It actually just landed in the shops here in Japan and I had a fiddle around with one. Sadly, I didn't have any adapted lenses with me so the test was pretty much pointless...:/


Nov 17, 2012 at 10:13 AM
mortyb
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #13 · p.34 #13 · NEX Discussion Thread


Nevermind.


Nov 18, 2012 at 06:46 PM
Phillip Reeve
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #14 · p.34 #14 · NEX Discussion Thread


Krosavcheg wrote:
Anyone had chance to play with NEX-6 extensively? It actually just landed in the shops here in Japan and I had a fiddle around with one. Sadly, I didn't have any adapted lenses with me so the test was pretty much pointless...:/

mine should arrive at the end of the month, if you have any special questions just ask and i will try to answear them as fast as possible.

Phillip



Nov 18, 2012 at 11:05 PM
Adam211
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #15 · p.34 #15 · NEX Discussion Thread


Krosavcheg wrote:
Anyone had chance to play with NEX-6 extensively? It actually just landed in the shops here in Japan and I had a fiddle around with one. Sadly, I didn't have any adapted lenses with me so the test was pretty much pointless...:/


I own one, but haven't had a NEX before, so my comments might be more for NEX cameras in general.

Compared to my 300D though, it's amazing. Main complaint is lack of control over the dials. Also, the grip is good but not great, but I can't imagine it's much different than some of the other NEX grips. It feels ungainly and uncomfortable with a Rokkor 58/1.2 but heavenly with a G 45, probably like the other NEXes.

Haven't used wireless yet (haven't had a need to) but I suppose today or sometime I'll start playing around with that. Images look fantastic, but when shooting on a cloudy day on default metering all my images are 1-2 stops underexposed. I do prefer that to the opposite problem. Also, there's still noise at ISO 100 even when properly exposed.

Other than that, it's a pleasure to use and feels great dangling from my neck. Not much to say about it really. It does everything I want a camera to do and does it in a small package. I though the EVF would annoy me but I love it. Not as good as, say, an OM-1 viewfinder, but far, far better than the Rebel optical viewfinders.

Also, I will say, I never thought I wanted a touchscreen, and the NEX interface is actually pretty clean and does well without one, but it would be even better with a touchscreen. I wish it had one.



Nov 19, 2012 at 12:35 AM
uhoh7
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #16 · p.34 #16 · NEX Discussion Thread


Anyone see a decent review of the SEL1018?

Shipping now, I guess

225 grams I'm drooling



Nov 21, 2012 at 04:00 AM
woodrim
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #17 · p.34 #17 · NEX Discussion Thread


uhoh7, where ya been? Haven't seen you over at MF Lenses in a while.

I finally purhased a NEX-5N a few months back to use exclusively with MF lenses. I expected good performance, but what has really amazed me is how that camera has given new life to some of my lenses. Actually, I believe all of my lenses perform better, but the biggest surprice was the performance of my Vivitar Series 1 lenses, which previously exhibited lots of CA and were very soft at full aperture. I'm not able to shoot they at fully open with great sharpness and rarely need to correct for CA. These two recent shots were both taken with my Series 1 135/2.3 fully open with no post camera CA correction:






Nov 22, 2012 at 11:10 PM
Krosavcheg
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #18 · p.34 #18 · NEX Discussion Thread


Philip, Adam..thank you very much!
I am interested in dynamic range, IQ and high ISO performances mainly. If I ever take a plunge to get one I will probably stick it on full manual and be done with it...
Menus are indeed fiddly, but I think it's acceptable. Planning to have it as a travel camera and for street photography mainly.



Nov 23, 2012 at 03:31 AM
uhoh7
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #19 · p.34 #19 · NEX Discussion Thread


woodrim wrote:
uhoh7, where ya been? Haven't seen you over at MF Lenses in a while.

I finally purhased a NEX-5N a few months back to use exclusively with MF lenses. I expected good performance, but what has really amazed me is how that camera has given new life to some of my lenses. Actually, I believe all of my lenses perform better, but the biggest surprice was the performance of my Vivitar Series 1 lenses, which previously exhibited lots of CA and were very soft at full aperture. I'm not able to shoot they at fully open with great sharpness and rarely
...Show more
Wonderful shots. I became too controversial over there that's ok no hard feelings here, I'm often too plain spoken. I learned a tremendous bunch and loved the place. Once I declared Leica glass really was fantastic, well...that is not the place for such opinion. Then you are comparing 1024s on god knows what monitors, so it gets silly.

Glad you are enjoying the nex, I hope we will have a full frame version besides the vg900 soon.



Nov 23, 2012 at 04:29 AM
Adam211
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.34 #20 · p.34 #20 · NEX Discussion Thread


Krosavcheg wrote:
Philip, Adam..thank you very much!
I am interested in dynamic range, IQ and high ISO performances mainly. If I ever take a plunge to get one I will probably stick it on full manual and be done with it...
Menus are indeed fiddly, but I think it's acceptable. Planning to have it as a travel camera and for street photography mainly.


I can only compare with my 300D. Still, the images respond quite well to pushing and pulling. There is noise at base ISO, but not beyond what might be expected.

Dynamic range: Again, can't compare to other NEXes. But it's beyond what my 300D could handle. It's probably very comparable to the other NEXes, from what I've seen. Skies still get patchy when overexposed in high contrast scenes, but for me it handles them better than my old Rebel. I'd happily accept an improvement in this area, but I assume it is at least as good as most other APS-Cs.

Image quality: No complaints. I've only shot in mostly overcast conditions, but so far (converting to DNG to use in LR3) I've been pleased with the colors. That was a concern of mine when buying a NEX but so far I've found the raw files easy to work with to get what you want.

I haven't shot at anything above ISO 1600 (which I found good), but the viewfinder gets significantly less pleasant in low-lighting situations.



Nov 23, 2012 at 05:15 AM
1       2       3              33      
34
       35              42       43       end




FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              33      
34
       35              42       43       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Reset password