p.1 #9 · canon 24mm 1.4 - worth the extra $$$ for newer version?
Question for you guys!
I have the 16-35ii and I love it for wide, but always wish I had f/1.4; would you say that the 24L v1 is a sharper lens?
I would love to hear your opinions!! If I sold that lens, I would be an all prime shooter
p.1 #10 · canon 24mm 1.4 - worth the extra $$$ for newer version?
I've owned the original 24 and recently upgraded to the ii version. I have to say, both are great. I don't think people put a lot of value into the newest version for some reason, but it is sharper and faster than the old version. I like both, kinda wish I would have kept the old version too.
p.1 #11 · canon 24mm 1.4 - worth the extra $$$ for newer version?
I would say it depends on how much you see yourself using it. If you plan to have it as an occasional use lens, then the original will suit you fine. But if you seeing it being an important staple in your bag, then springing for the VII is probably worth it.
I have the VII and generally really like it, though I do find it VERY picky with focusing. It also has more CA than I'm used to with L primes.
p.1 #12 · canon 24mm 1.4 - worth the extra $$$ for newer version?
ejeroth wrote:
Question for you guys!
I have the 16-35ii and I love it for wide, but always wish I had f/1.4; would you say that the 24L v1 is a sharper lens?
I would love to hear your opinions!! If I sold that lens, I would be an all prime shooter
I run with the 24L v2 as my primary lens. for me, the 16-35L is the extra wide when needed.
also run with 50 and 135. some times changing the 135 to 85 f1.8 depending on the size/area of wedding or situation.
p.1 #13 · canon 24mm 1.4 - worth the extra $$$ for newer version?
The 16-35L II is a pretty darn sharp lens, but it's totally different than what the 24L does IMO. I'd much rather have the faster prime than the ultra wide angle.
