Yep William, I'm not sure I'll be running out to grab one at that price it would need to be as sharp as a 35L .. but somehow I can't see it ever being so ...
My 24-70 is razor sharp. My 70-200 is first version is very sharp. Give me something to think about canon, I don't need these. How about a better flash system, what happened with the rumor of the 630? EX, that's far more interesting and beneficial.
Don't forget the zoom lock. That's gotta be worth a few bucks, eh?lol The 70-200 2.8II was a few hundred bucks over the ver1 so some people could justify the premium to upgrade for the increase in performance...but basically doubling the asking price? Get real.