VladiD wrote:
Do you really want 36MP for portraits? Won't the incredible detail reveal a lot of natural blemishes that are undesirable for portraits?
Revlon, Estee Lauder, et al - this poxy low resolution of 36MB isn't good enough for them.
I wasn't happy with the first photo linked as it appears as though the model was still moving slightly. Looks like it was lit with only a ring flash too.
At 100% you can see a clear line of plaque on her teeth showing. (I would not be happy if I was her)
The preview images are pretty impressive. Lots of detail. The girl with the vail looks to have Visi-Tint contact lenses and she has a tiny spec of mascara under the edge of the lens of her right eye. And small blotches of mascara on her lid/brow area. WOW. Pixel peepers can go crazy with this camera.