fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
  

Archive 2012 · Going to India, lenses

  
 
Edward Castro
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Going to India, lenses


What lenses should I take? I'm planing on renting so I'm not stuck with the ones I currently have (which is very limited).

Thanks!



Feb 04, 2012 at 11:41 AM
Xavier Rival
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Going to India, lenses


There are so many different ways to visit and photograph India, I do not think it is really possible to answer a question like that... What area are you going to visit and what kind of things you want to photograph, in what season, how you are going to deal with transportation?


Feb 04, 2012 at 01:13 PM
Edward Castro
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · Going to India, lenses


Going next month to Delhi, Agra (Taj Mahal & Fort) & Jaipur. I have no wide lenses, only a 50mm & 70-200. You think I should rent a TS-E for Taj Mahal?


Feb 04, 2012 at 03:07 PM
Ralph Conway
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Going to India, lenses


What are you going/planing to shoot?


Feb 04, 2012 at 03:09 PM
Edward Castro
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · Going to India, lenses


Anything and every thing. People & architecture are the principle ones I suppose.


Feb 04, 2012 at 03:27 PM
Xavier Rival
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · Going to India, lenses


I did go to Taj Mahal almost 10 years ago (ouch! time is going fast), and I had a 24mm on a film camera. That was adequate, as far as I can remember. On a crop camera, I would make sure to have at least a 17mm lens. Nice views can be had from a distance. The same goes in most architectural places. A real wide angle (20mm equiv on a full frame body, say about 14mm on a crop sensor) will be a bonus.
For people, the two lenses you have should work well.
I am not sure a TS lens would be very practical (I never really used one, but feel I would probably not want to do so in the midle of a crowd, and would rather be on a tripod, with time to prepare the shot; something you should not really expect to have in place like Taj Mahal---tripods were prohibited when I was there).

To sum up, I would probably add a 17-xx lens to your set up. Not sure renting it is the most effective solution, as opposed to purchasing and possibly selling back after the trip.



Feb 04, 2012 at 03:38 PM
brockwhittaker
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · Going to India, lenses


Hi! I lived in India for six months, and I only had a T3i, Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3, and a nifty fifty. Of course, I would recommend some better equipment, so here we go:

Rent yourself a Canon 24-105mm f/4L, a 70-200 f/4L IS, and rent a Canon 15mm fisheye. Also bring a nice portrait prime.. Maybe an AF 85mm f/1.8, or similar.

You will of course want the 24-105L for most daily things. There is a lot of street photography to be done in the cities. The 70-200L could be great for street portraits (If Indians see you with this lens, they will want their photo taken!), and also great for the monkeys. When we went to Jaipur, we went to the Monkey Temple, where we had the opportunity to take photos of tons of these monkeys. The monkeys are easy to photograph, and in fact, I took 99% of my monkey photos with a 50mm f/1.8. Therefore, you would have an advantage if you used a 70-200L. The 85mm f/1.8 would be great for non-invasive portraits of say, older people on the street who are less willing to stop and get their photo taken.

Just to warn you, in Agra and Delhi, there is this terrible fog that looms every morning, so don't expect to get any Nat Geo quality photos before 1PM .

I'd also say that a TS-e lens is not needed for the Taj, as the point where you will most likely stand and shoot from, is far enough away that you will have straight lines.

Robberies and such are not a problem that I have experienced in India, but fly rocks from rickshaws is. Make sure you always have a UV filter on your lens. Especially if you have a TS-e lens.

The fisheye, I would recommend to capture the vibrant downtown scenes in Dehli. The streets are packed with tons of Indians all the time, so you could get some great ones with the 15mm.

This will happen to you a lot: http://www.flickr.com/photos/brockwhittaker/6490565375/in/photostream

Here is the Amber Fort in Jaipur (Taken with my Siggy) http://www.flickr.com/photos/brockwhittaker/6611951247/in/photostream

Taj Mahal.. Not taken with a TS-e!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/brockwhittaker/6599891487/in/photostream

I took this with a 50mm f/1.8, so you could get in even closer with an 85mm, or your 70-200L.. You will see lots of monkeys.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/brockwhittaker/6606630575/in/photostream

Also taken with just a 50mm f/1.8.. Another monkey down in Bengaluru.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/brockwhittaker/6542590893/in/photostream

Just some blah blah rice field in Kerala. Bring a Polarizer, and a good ND Grad filter!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/brockwhittaker/6241263608/in/photostream/



Feb 04, 2012 at 03:55 PM
brockwhittaker
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · Going to India, lenses


And a portrait of an incense maker. Taken with my 50mm f/1.8
http://www.flickr.com/photos/brockwhittaker/6246146344/in/photostream/



Feb 04, 2012 at 03:55 PM
Rajan Parrikar
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #9 · Going to India, lenses


As stated above, 24-105L will be your bread and butter lens. A fast portrait lens like the 135L will complement it well. TSE lenses at Taj Mahal won't be convenient as no tripod is allowed.

Check out my site at www.parrikar.com and PM me if you have specific questions.



Feb 04, 2012 at 10:15 PM
Edward Castro
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · Going to India, lenses


Well I don't have a FF, only a APS-C, so you think the 24-105 would still be a good choice? What about the EF-S lenses, would those be more appropriate?


Feb 04, 2012 at 10:59 PM
lhryshko
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #11 · Going to India, lenses


We just came back from a trip to Italy and shot almost exclusively with a 17-55 mm EF-S. Loved it. Probably would have loved the 16-35 mm more, but for a relatively inexpensive lens, the 17-55 is great.


Feb 04, 2012 at 11:06 PM
Rajan Parrikar
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #12 · Going to India, lenses


Edward Castro wrote:
Well I don't have a FF, only a APS-C, so you think the 24-105 would still be a good choice? What about the EF-S lenses, would those be more appropriate?


In that case pack a 17-40L and a fast 85mm.

Added: If 17-55 is good, that'll work, too. I have no experience with that lens.



Feb 05, 2012 at 02:48 AM
Xavier Rival
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · Going to India, lenses


Edward Castro wrote:
Well I don't have a FF, only a APS-C, so you think the 24-105 would still be a good choice? What about the EF-S lenses, would those be more appropriate?


No, it would not, as I said in my post above. To get something similar, you would need a 17-xx lens (actually, that is a bit less wide than 24mm on full frame, but I think it would still be ok in India). There are various EF-s and non EF-s options, depending on your budget, need to have IS or a f/2.8 aperture.

Another option would be to have one more zoom, and take 10-22, 24-105 and your 70-200.
If I were using an APS-C body, I might actually do something similar. With a full frame sensor, I would probably take 17-40 + 70-200 + a couple of primes, as I think that 200mm is more than enough for most things in India (except widlife).



Feb 05, 2012 at 03:59 AM
Edward Castro
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · Going to India, lenses


Well since I have this thread going, let me ask an off-topic question:

What type of electrical plug adapter do I need? I'm in the US. I got the two prong version, but I've read I might need the 3 prong version in some areas.



Feb 24, 2012 at 03:52 PM
Don Clary
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · Going to India, lenses


http://electricaloutlet.org/

220V

I've been twice; last time, 2007. You will not be permitted to use tripod in Taj Mahal, Fatepur Sikri, or Khajuraho. I know; I tried and was refused. I took full frame (5D), with prime lenses from 21mm to 300mm. I only used 200mm and 300mm in two places (Khajuraho and Jaipur). So for full frame, 21mm to 100 is most used.

Here are precise framings for full frame (you must correct for your 30D) at Taj Mahal:

Just inside front entrance, landscape orientation, tight framing of white building and minarets, no formal gardens: 100mm. 85mm would have been better.

Halfway from front entrance to main building, on the raised white marble platform: 50mm in vertical format, including minarets.

Walking the two side red sandstone side buildings, looking through red sandstone arch of side buildings toward white Taj Mahal: 35mm in portrait orientation.

This will give very precise information on exactly what focal length will cover at the Taj Mahal.



Feb 24, 2012 at 05:20 PM
Yakim Peled
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · Going to India, lenses


Don Clary wrote:
I only used 200mm and 300mm in two places (Khajuraho and Jaipur).


Getting close-ups of far away stony tits?

Happy shooting,
Yakim.



Feb 24, 2012 at 05:59 PM
timpdx
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · Going to India, lenses


I just booked a trip to Southern India an hour ago , which will be my second trip to the country. I went to all the places you are planning to visit in 2009/10.

Here is my experience, and my opinions:

Equipment was a 5D, 24-105 and 24LII along with an E-P1 for backup and tele (Panasonic 90-400 equiv)

IMO street portraits happen so fast, like you are going to stop, swap lenses and then take the photo.....not. Unless you are going to walk around all day with just a prime mounted, I would skip it unless you are into night photography, then by all means. But every portrait that I was happy with was taken with the 24-105 and the moments happened waaaaay too fast to even think about switching lenses.

This trip, I am strongly considering leaving the 24LII at home, even though I loved shooting with it at night, just too wide to make for interesting pics. This time my new and sharp 50/1.8 will go, it performed above my expectations when I went to Japan in December for my night photos.

You don't need more than 24 at the Taj or the Forts in Delhi, Agra or Jaipur. But you will want the ability to isolate, see Don Clary's notes above, they seem to match my exif data when I just quickly looked through my shots.

I brought the E-P1 for the tele and hardly used it, I was only happy with a couple of distant shots in Jodhpur, and I used it for some fun 720p videos, too. Playing with video was fun, actually.

So my India kit this time will likely be the 5DII, 24-105, 50/1.8 and either my NEX3 or just an S95 for backup and to mess with video again.

I travel light, I have never done an international trip with more than 2 lenses for my main camera and I also always take a competent backup, the E-P1 then or the NEX now.

If I had a crop body, for SURE I would take the 15-85IS and then a second lens depending on what you shoot, like a prime for night (on a crop, the Sigma 30 is simply great, that is what I used on my 7D when I went around the world) The 17-55 is great, but 17 is not wide enough, IMO, on a crop body.

I also shot a number of panos for vast landscapes or wide shots of the Rajasthan forts.

My India shots are here:

http://www.pixelmap.com/sl_india.html

all night shots and portraits are with the 24LII, the rest is 24-105 action and maybe 2 of those shots are E-P1. All the photos are not clickable yet, but many are.

India is probably my favorite place to photo, the people are very receptive to portraits, the cities are endlessly fascinating, the textures, architecture and street life are simply the best in the world (well, maybe Cairo street life can match India, but the people there don't take well to portraits).






The best shots of the Jaipur Amber Fort were fired from the taxi, there was not many place to pull over, so I had to hammer away on the shutter to get these views of the complete fort. (so keep that in mind and warn your driver that you will want to pull over when you can, my driver just wanted to get is money and drop me up at the entrance)



Feb 24, 2012 at 06:08 PM
DmitriM
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · Going to India, lenses


Taj @ 24mm

http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/1562/24nn1small.jpg


Taj @85mm

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/2790/85mmsmall.jpg



Feb 24, 2012 at 06:42 PM
Don Clary
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · Going to India, lenses


Getting close-ups of far away stony tits?

Yep, you got that right!



Feb 24, 2012 at 06:57 PM
Avi B
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · Going to India, lenses


Delhi will be hot already. No fog in the morning, except that crappy haze. Agra also has bad haze these days, tough to get blue skies behind it.

Since you are shooting with crop bodies, I would rent a 17-55 which is a good range for most shooting. Also a wide-angle is useful for when you are inside Amber Palace or Jaygarh Fort.

Since you are going to Jaipur, see if you can stay over at Neemrana, a 14th century fortress converted into a hotel. It's quite nice. It's 1/2 way between Delhi and Jaipur:
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/48/337148.jpg


I would also take a tele for some shots. Maybe get a Nikon AIS 105/2.5 and a cheap mount adapter? But the bulk of the shooting should be covered by the 17-55 I'd say.



Feb 25, 2012 at 12:01 AM
       2       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account