AJay Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
kevindar wrote:
Ajay, although I like your comparison, take a look here
Now this is comparing the 1d3 vs 7d
http://iwishicouldfly.com/iwishicouldfly/journal/pdfs/Canon%207D%20vs%201D%20Mark%20III.pdf
to say pixel density certainly makes no difference, just makes no sense to me.
I did not state that it does not matter. Yes, of course it does. My point has to do with the quality of the final image you produce. In my three-way comparison on page 2 of this thread. The 7D w/o any noise reduction produced the highest resolution of all three cameras, but had the highest noise level. As I stated in my comparison, I applied appropriate noise reduction to all three images, then cropped them identically.
My point here is that after cropping and processing an image taken from a set distance, all three of these cameras are so close image quality wise that they are difficult to tell apart.
With regards to my comparison between the 7D and the Mark III (That was my study as well.), The Mark III is only a 10MP camera with a 1.3x crop. It has really low noise levels but the resolution is lower as well. Eventually you will get to a point with low pixel density sensors that the resolution is just not enough when attempting to do any serious cropping of an image.
Going back to the purpose of this original thread, the quality of the image between the Mark IV and 7D (In at focal-length-limited scenario) is so close after applying appropriate noise reduction and cropping that quality should not be the deciding factor when choosing one of these two cameras if and only if you are using the cameras in a focal-length-limited scenario.
Alan
www.iwishicouldfly.com
|