Gunzorro Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #24 · The new 25mm f2 Distagon ZF | |
zhangyue wrote:
Sorry, why people hate this lens? There are not enough pictures make it deserve BAD reputation yet. Why so negative here?
This focal length is not my priority but does it make it a bad lens? The op's pic is in cloudy day without any extra effort in editing to bring out the contrast and color, he want to show the sharpness of the lens, which I think it did showing it is good. Which corner we are talking about?
F5.6 with 25mm may not enough to keep everything sharp, especially with 12M picture, I think the photo will be benefit more with f8 or so before diffraction kick in.
Plus, I never think modern day Zeiss has any obvious advantage in sharpness compare new Nikon and Canon offer. Say a 35mmf1.4, comparing Canikon offerm it is not sharper. But people still love it. Why this lens get treated totally different??
Hate? I don't see any hate in the thread up to yours and AhamB's remarks about haters.
Why? Well for starters, the lens has the 21/2.8 to live up to -- one of the legendary modern Zeiss wide angle lens designs.
Second, the 25 is being heavily hyped and hoped for, probably too much based on the edge performance we are seeing in test shots. That sets up a conflict between people's wants and reality -- hard for the lens to match up to some of those expectations and desires.
Third, it's an expensive lens, having to prove itself superior optically to other models like the 24/1.4L II that have more features. Potential buyers are naturally going to scrutinize its pluses and minused very carefully.
Personally, I think the color looks "Zeissy" and I'm not surprised by the vignetting, field curvature or SA. So far, I haven't seen any samples that show amazing contrast.
Will the value ultimately match the price? That remains to be seen.
Jorge -- The complaint about the corners (relates to edges too) has to do with the lower res associated with vignetting and SA -- quite evident as dark corners in your first example. Your enlarged samples of the corners have been lightened quite a bit from the original, so it's not quite a fair assessment except for sharpness, which has accurately been remarked on as less than sharp on the tree and pigeon.
Still, the lens is putting out a good effort at quality. Will it be enough to convince buyers to add to their 21/2.8 and 35/2 (or 1.4), or will it even live up to those standards, or to buy instead of either of those lenses? That's simply the challenge the 25/2 faces.
|