Tariq Gibran Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #25 · Fujifilm X-Pro1 interchangeable lens | |
carstenw wrote:
With all due respect, it has not yet happened that an APS-C sensor delivered better IQ than equivalent-generation FF sensors, nor that a MFT sensor delivered better IQ than an equivalent-generation APS-C sensor, and so on. To make such a claim is just foolish on Fuji's part. All it would take to prove it wrong is to use the same sensor technology in a FF camera, and *bam*.
On the other hand, if Fuji would use their Super-CCD technology, or something equivalent for CMOS, then we might have an APS-C sensor with more dynamic range than most FF sensors. They will have to either figure out how to do live view with their CCD sensor, or port the large-pixel/small-pixel architecture to CMOS though, neither of which is easy, I would guess. Probably the only downside to such a camera would be Fuji's tendency towards heavy AA filters, and this could be offset at least partly by high resolution, but high ISO would suffer. The colours could be really great, if they match the S2/S3 rather than the X100.
IF Fuji has developed a new groundbreaking - and proprietary - sensor technology (as indicated with the organic sensor patent), all bets are off with regard to prior history and APS v FF, since in those comparisons the technology was basically the same. The only thing we can say at the moment for certainty is that a FF sensor would have less dof at a given aperture vs APS and run into less issues with diffraction at a given F-stop, both simply due to the size difference.
|