RobertLynn Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.2 #3 · Share your best 24Lii shots! | |
stanj wrote:
RobertLynn wrote:
I don't think both versions were out for 11 years.
stanj wrote:
I can dig up my receipt for the 24L dating to late 1997.
RobertLynn wrote:
I don't think both versions were out for 11 years.
stanj wrote:
I can dig up my receipt for the 24L dating to late 1997.
rogie wrote:
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-24mm-f-1.4-L-II-USM-Lens-Review.aspx
TDP lists the 24L as being released in 1997.
RobertLynn wrote:
Can you dig up for receipt for the 24L Mk2 dating back to 1997?
My comment was, I do not believe that both were out for 11 years. More elaborately speaking, I don't think that you could've compared your version 1 to the-then, non-existant version 2.
So the expression "ignorance is bliss" is in full merit there. Basically, you couldn't enjoy the improvements of version 2, when it wasn't released yet.
And this kind of moronic arguments is the reason why I have you normally hidden. Never did I say that I had both for 11 years.
Having owned the mk1 for 11 years, 9 of which I used it on full frame, I am fairly acquainted with its deficiencies and never found them to be all that bothersome. Given that I have shot both the mk1 and mk2 for an overlapping time on the same body (1Ds3 and 5D2), I feel like I am reasonably adept at making a comparison.
Then hide me again. I'm glad you couldn't see any humor in my initial post (ripping on myself for obsessive tendencies). I wasn't saying you couldn't make a comparison. I wasn't saying you didn't own the lens for 11 years. I wasn't saying you didn't shoot full-frame. I was simply saying taht there was no version 2 for you to obsess over the for first 11 years you used the version one.
Nothing more, nothing less. Glad you felt the need to make it a fight, call me a moron and start a fight on Christmas. Sorry for offending you so much.
|