It is a beautiful portrait with your subject perfectly exposed. The only issue I see it that the background isn't complimentary. What I mean by that is the bright background competes with your subject creating some tension but without putting in him in any context which is what you would expect from such an environmental portrait.
fantastic. great expression. love how the eyes stand out so much. look at his hands and shirt, gotta wonder the story behind that. good to show your kids when they are not finishing their dinner.
Spyros! I've missed your posts. Good to see you again.
This one has good expression and a very nice pose. Nice balance to the composition too.
As for the background, you chose the "darkly exposed subject against a bright background", which works well. It just doesn't add any context - we can't see what the bright background is - as pointed out by George. I see this as a very minor point. There may have been little back there to include, or what was back there was better left unseen.
I like the background and think it serves your subject well. "Environment" is not needed. This is a portrait not a photo essay on another starving black child ...
george malamis wrote:
It is a beautiful portrait with your subject perfectly exposed. The only issue I see it that the background isn't complimentary. What I mean by that is the bright background competes with your subject creating some tension .
+1 on that.
george malamis wrote:
but without putting in him in any context which is what you would expect from such an environmental portrait.
-1 on this. I think it's a great portrait on its own and the showing of the environment is not necesarily instrumental to it.
Wow, this is great, tells 20 stories in one image. The only think I could think of is to dodge a bit (and I mean a real little bit) around his eyes, forehead and lips. Brighten up the face a bit, because that is a powerful expression.
I like the blown out background, gives me the sense he is hiding or hidden in some way.
I like the background and think it serves your subject well. "Environment" is not needed. This is a portrait not a photo essay on another starving black child ...
Just to reiterate my first statement - it is a beautiful portrait. What I mean by environment is that without the title I don't place him there from the rest of the photograph. Now I don't think you need to have Congo blazing in the background either but something that ties me in who he is. It is such a powerful portrait that I want to know more.
Jim Rickards wrote:
Spyros! I've missed your posts. Good to see you again.
This one has good expression and a very nice pose. Nice balance to the composition too.
As for the background, you chose the "darkly exposed subject against a bright background", which works well. It just doesn't add any context - we can't see what the bright background is - as pointed out by George. I see this as a very minor point. There may have been little back there to include, or what was back there was better left unseen.
Hi Jim, friends:
Many thanks for your comments. About the background - it was a tough call. I chose in the end to blur the background simply because there was not much there, and I wanted to isolate him. Point noted about need for context.
Carolyn1250 wrote:
Wow, this is great, tells 20 stories in one image. The only think I could think of is to dodge a bit (and I mean a real little bit) around his eyes, forehead and lips. Brighten up the face a bit, because that is a powerful expression.
I like the blown out background, gives me the sense he is hiding or hidden in some way.
Carolyn, thanks so much! I will try out your suggestions. Best, Spyros
Wow- the black and white takes the intensity up several notches. In the color version my eye seems to gravitate to his right hand, but in the black and white conversion I focus on the eyes. Nice work.
