fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
  

Archive 2009 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1

  
 
jhapeman
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


Well, the subject line says it all. I ordered my Olympus E-P1 last week when they first showed up on B&H and was lucky enough to get one before they sold out. I was supposed to get it on Friday, but UPS screwed up and I didn't get it until last night at 6:00 pm. I've now had it for 24 hours and done a bunch of shooting with it--roughly 250 shots between last evening and this evening. I figured I would summarize my observations for those interested, as I know interest in this camera is very high.

General Camera Observations

First impressions out of the box are that this is a very well-made camera. It feels nice in the hand, and even though the lens is plastic, it also feels very well-built. The bundle includes a nice strap. Overall, the weight feels nearly identical to my G10, and in fact it's 15g lighter. The camera is very attractive, and while I would prefer an all-black or nearly all-black body, it's not as shiny as it might look from the product shots on the web.

The camera UI is pretty well-done, and mostly pretty easy to figure out. It's a little "deep" and could stand to be simplified. It makes you appreciate the very slick UI Canon has developed on the G9/G10. It has a weird way of turning on the more advanced settings--which are hidden by default--so you really have to read the manual to get the full benefit of this camera. That said, it is highly customizable, with tons of useful options in the menu.

In terms of buttons, the camera is a bit sparse on top, but overall its adequate. The shutter button is very responsive and well-placed. There is an EV compensation button on top; it's oddly placed and perhaps would be better placed on the back, but I did learn to make it work for me. I like the way the mode dial is recessed from above and changed via a thumb wheel that comes out on the back. Again, this is where the G10 in particular leads the way: the manual mode dials on the G10 are brilliant and allow for rapid changes of standard items such as EV and ISO. I'd love to see something similar on the E-P1. The rear wheel works well, but it a tad bit small. The vertically-oriented thumb wheel is used for zooming images, and it works very well.

Rear LCD Screen

This is my only disappointment so far with the E-P1. The screen is actually very good, with great color and contrast, and a very good anti-reflective coating on a matte finish. I found it more usable than my G9/G10 today when out in bright sunlight, primarily because of the matte finish. You can tweak both the brightness and the color rendition of the rear screen. The main disappointment is that its only 230,000 pixels. With all of the other high-end compacts already going to 460,000 pixels, I found its hard to go back. You don't have nearly the ability to judge critical focus that you do with a higher-resolution screen. This is partly compensated by how much you can zoom in on the images, but it would still be preferable to have a higher-resolution screen.

Autofocus Performance

A topic of some discussion on the Internet is the AF performance of this camera. The best way for me to summarize it is to compare it. It's very similar to my G9/G10; maybe just a tiny bit slower than the G10, but not by much. The face-detect function works very well. Like all AF systems, it slows down and hunts more as it gets into lower-light situations. I didn't find the AF to be a problem in any of the shooting I did today; while its not at DSLR performance levels, it is really very good. It's also very accurate, and I didn't have any shots where the AF missed after it locked. There is a dedicated mode that allows you to manual override the AF, which is where I left it all the time. That said, I never intervened with MF as a result of missed focus, and only used it a few times to change my DOF/perspective combination with selective focus.

I will stick the in-body IS system in here as well, since its somewhat related to AF. It works very well, and I'm not sure what else to say. They claim four stops and I would say its very close to that based on my shooting so far. Because of the potential for using old Olympus OM lenses and other third-party lenses via adapter, the fact that the IS is in-body is actually very attractive.

Image Quality

This is the meat of the camera. Many camera enthusiasts have longed and begged for a camera like the E-P1, with a larger sensor in a smaller body. The reason is image quality. Here the E-P1 delivers and delivers in spades. Olympus has put a very good sensor in this camera; the dynamic range and noise capabilities are very similar to most DSLRs. It's a 2x crop sensor, so its nice and big, and I like that Olympus kept it to 12MP rather than try to cram any more in there. Images look great up to ISO 800, where a little bit of noise creeps in--but very little. It is very usable at ISO 1600, and I would feel quite comfortable using ISO 3200 in a pinch. Even ISO 6400 would be acceptable for a web-sized image.

The low-pass anti-aliasing filter must be very weak, as the images are very sharp right out of the camera. This is an improvement from other Olympus cameras based on images I have seen on the web. Overall I would say that the image quality is extremely close to a 40D or 50D.

Related to image quality is the quality of the jpeg engine in the camera. I don't use jpeg very often, but when I want it, I want the images to come out of the camera ready for printing or publishing on the web. The in-camera jpegs come out very nice, with good detail and color. You will want to tune the noise reduction and shadow fill to taste (Olympus has a setting called "gradation" that can be used to open up or close up the shadows in images), as well as saturation and sharpening, but the choices are well-done, and I could get the camera to kick out very pleasing jpeg images with just a little work. The auto white balance does a pretty good job, although it generally renders images a bit warmer than I like. I can live with it in the jpegs, and can tune it out in the raw files.

Performance

The camera performs very well. The write speed and fps are very good for a camera of this type and size. The camera feels very responsive in use, and the AF--as detailed above--is very good. Browsing the menus is very quick. The camera powers up and is ready for shooting very quickly. The main slowdown is extending the zoom lens from the retracted position, which has to be done manually. That won't be an issue with the primes and non-collapsing zooms. Shot to shot speed is very good. The camera can shoot continuously at a rate of 3fps which is great for a compact camera, and more than I will likely ever use on this camera. The buffer clears pretty quickly, especially with a fast SD card. I have been using a Sandisk Extreme III 8GB card. I have not waited on the camera buffer or card at all.

Bundled Software

The bundled software is adequate. I would not normally load the manufacturer's software, but I need it to open the raw files. It has limited controls for raw editing, but enough to be useful for now. I am eager for the next release of ACR to include support for the E-P1. Hopefully Apple will support it in OS X as well, so I can use Aperture for the file management. I suspect it will be in a OS X patch in the coming months, although Apple is a bit spotty with releases for camera raw files. I used the Olympus software to make some adjustments to raw files and then saved as TIFFs to open in Photoshop so I could run my "prepare for web" action. Those files are missing the full EXIF data in my gallery.

Final Thoughts and Gallery

Overall I am hugely satisfied with this camera. It's almost everything I would have wanted. It will definitely be the camera I pick up most often when out around town, or on a quick family trip. I took it today to a petting zoo, and I have a number of the shots in the gallery I will be linking below. I really hope that Canon decides to make a camera like this, but if not, I won't care much if Olympus makes a few more lenses for this camera and works to improve the ergonomics a bit. In the end, a camera like this needs a new ecosystem of lenses anyway, so having a different manufacturer than most of my gear is not really an issue. I am also looking forward to someone developing an adapter for the Leica M glass. It would be great to stick some premium fast glass on this camera. I am quite sure that this will happen in fairly short order.

Bottom line: This is a ground-breaking camera, and I will be keeping it. I can't believe that it took so long for a manufacturer to put a model like this out there.

Here's a selection of shots from my first 24 hours with the E-P1. I will have to wait to upload larger files, as I am at my vacation house with only satellite internet, which has a bandwidth cap. In the meantime, these web-sized images give you some taste of what the camera can do. I will try to answer any questions anyone here might have.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jhapeman/sets/72157620942156065/

Jeff



Jul 07, 2009 at 09:20 PM
picnic
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


There are several adaptors for M to m4/3rds.

http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dx428wg_10fdvsmtd7



Jul 07, 2009 at 09:35 PM
Justin D
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


Nice review. Thanks for the effort. Are your comments based only on the kit zoom? Or were you able to use the 17 as well? If your shots came out of the kit zoom it looks like a solid performer - that's exactly what I want a kit zoom to do, come up with sharp presentable webshots... That sounds a bit like damning with faint praise - I mean that, judging from the small jpgs, those shots are very nice.


Jul 07, 2009 at 09:44 PM
jhapeman
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


picnic wrote:
There are several adaptors for M to m4/3rds.

http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dx428wg_10fdvsmtd7


Thanks! I hadn't really poked around yet. That said, that page is deceptive. Most of the links are not for micro-Four Thirds, but rather standard Four Thirds. One has to check each link to verify. That said, I just ordered the CameraQuest adapter.



Jul 07, 2009 at 10:04 PM
jhapeman
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


Justin D wrote:
Nice review. Thanks for the effort. Are your comments based only on the kit zoom? Or were you able to use the 17 as well? If your shots came out of the kit zoom it looks like a solid performer - that's exactly what I want a kit zoom to do, come up with sharp presentable webshots... That sounds a bit like damning with faint praise - I mean that, judging from the small jpgs, those shots are very nice.


Yes, that's the kit lens. The 17mm doesn't seem to have made it into the US except at one retailer. I have my eye out for one, as I suspect it will be the lens that I will use most of the time. Ideally I would like a set of primes that would be roughly 10mm, 25mm, and 45mm or thereabouts.

The kit lens is quite capable. Images are nice and sharp, even wide open, and have limited CA. The corners are quite good, and tighten up nicely when stopped down one or two stops. My shots have had only very minor sharpening done after I reduced them for the web.



Jul 07, 2009 at 10:10 PM
Justin D
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


I have picked up an EOS to m4/3 adapter and a Konica 40mm 1.8 plus adapter in anticipation of this camera - it will almost be like having a crop EOS camera as I can use all my zeiss, OM and leica lenses on the EP-1. And frankly, I'd be using liveview to focus on any Canon crop camera anyway, so the screen thing isn't a big deal and liveview is better implemented on Oly bodies than Canon ones. I'm hoping to have the two lens kit by the end of the week, so will report back on how the 17 and the Konica go as I imagine there are plenty who will use those two lenses on the EP-1.

I will end up with an Oly kit of the kit zoom (thinking about the 12-60, but will see how the kit goes), 17, Konica 40 and the Contax 85 2.8. Throw in the voigtlander 180 f4 APO instead of the zoom or 85 for special occasions and you have a very small kit which will fit in a very small shoulder bag or even a couple of very large coat pockets.



Jul 07, 2009 at 10:19 PM
mawz
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


jhapeman wrote:
Thanks! I hadn't really poked around yet. That said, that page is deceptive. Most of the links are not for micro-Four Thirds, but rather standard Four Thirds. One has to check each link to verify. That said, I just ordered the CameraQuest adapter.


For most SLR mounts the best option is the MA1 adapter from Panasonic plus a 4/3rds adapter which is why those 4/3rds adapters are listed. Why buy an expensive direct mount adapter when a cheaper, more flexible option exists. That's what I'm currently using on my G1 for Nikon, Contax and M42 mount stuff. It also enables use of 4/3rds lenses of course, a capability I use on occasion (a G1 with a ZD 35-100 f2 is quite the comic sight, unwieldy as well).

I've also got the Novoflex Leica M adapter (avoid it, it's fully functional but inferior to the other options) along with an LTM-M adapter which allows me to use most M and LTM lenses.



Jul 07, 2009 at 10:42 PM
jhapeman
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


Mawz,

What M lens would you recommend as a "must have" for this mount? I haven't fiddled with the Leica glass in the past; I'm an avid user/owner of Leica binoculars, but not lenses.



Jul 07, 2009 at 10:50 PM
Spyro P.
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


Thanks for that, very helpful
Could you show us some high iso shots when you get a chance, I cant seem to find them on your flickr



Jul 08, 2009 at 01:38 AM
Yakim Peled
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


Very usable info. Thank you.

Happy shooting,
Yakim.




Jul 08, 2009 at 02:11 AM
bdickers
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


If you're still searching for the 17mm, contact Melanie at Arlington Camera. They had one on Monday which I ordered, it's scheduled to arrive today. Good people to deal with, they're an Authorized Olympus Dealer. www.arlingtoncamera.com


Jul 08, 2009 at 08:45 AM
Sam Bennett
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


Thanks for taking the time to write this up.

What are you thoughts on shot-to-shot time? Do you feel like it's easy to take consecutive shots of the same subject (while doing portrait shooting, for instance). I'm not talking spray-and-pray by holding down the shutter release, I mean shooting, returning to half press, shooting again when the moment is right, etc. If you return to half-press does the camera keep focus lock, or does it automatically refocus?



Jul 08, 2009 at 09:13 AM
mawz
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


jhapeman wrote:
Mawz,

What M lens would you recommend as a "must have" for this mount? I haven't fiddled with the Leica glass in the past; I'm an avid user/owner of Leica binoculars, but not lenses.


As of now, I've tried the CV 25/4, CV 28/1.9, CV 35/1.2, CV 35/1.7, Summicron 35 v4, Nikkor-S.C 50/1.4 and M-Rokkor 90/4.

I'd strongly recommend a good 35 as a short/portrait tele. The Summicron is superb but not cheap, I'm considering tracking down a Nikkor 35/1.8 or 35/2 (I'm biased towards LTM rather than M mount since I own an LTM film body). A fast 50 is also strongly recommended and most work well on the G1. Wider lenses are a bit of a crapshoot, some have corner smearing issues or don't deliver enough resolution, others work very well. From what I've heard the CV 15 works like a charm (I'm going to be borrowing one to try) and the CV 21/4 and 25/4 do pretty well too (I can vouch for the 25/4). The M-Rokkor 90 was stunningly good even wide open. And it's tiny.



Jul 08, 2009 at 09:15 AM
jhapeman
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #14 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


Sam Bennett wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to write this up.

What are you thoughts on shot-to-shot time? Do you feel like it's easy to take consecutive shots of the same subject (while doing portrait shooting, for instance). I'm not talking spray-and-pray by holding down the shutter release, I mean shooting, returning to half press, shooting again when the moment is right, etc. If you return to half-press does the camera keep focus lock, or does it automatically refocus?


Very easy to take consecutive shots. It has about a .3s delay if you want to wait for the screen to refresh, but you can shoot several in a row without waiting for the screen to reload. It is a little weird if you don't have an optical viewfinder to shoot that way, but it can be done. Anyway, if you want to do the return to half-press, you just have about the .3s delay, and it doesn't need to refocus--it keeps the focus lock.



Jul 08, 2009 at 10:12 AM
Sam Bennett
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


jhapeman wrote:
Very easy to take consecutive shots. It has about a .3s delay if you want to wait for the screen to refresh, but you can shoot several in a row without waiting for the screen to reload. It is a little weird if you don't have an optical viewfinder to shoot that way, but it can be done. Anyway, if you want to do the return to half-press, you just have about the .3s delay, and it doesn't need to refocus--it keeps the focus lock.


Glad to hear it, thanks!



Jul 08, 2009 at 10:15 AM
jhapeman
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #16 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


OK, here's some 100% crops at ISO 1600. This was poor lighting, and I picked two subjects to show shadow handling and detail handling. I used the Olympus software to process these and turned off noise reduction and sharpening. I then saved as TIFF and used Photoshop to save as jpeg with a very mild Smart Sharpen on export.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3441/3700682837_b119b2f466_o.jpg

Cropped from:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2615/3700688149_8483b71a26_o.jpg

And for detail:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3432/3701490880_981859000e_o.jpg

Cropped from:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2509/3700688561_8c5319cae1_o.jpg

Also, these shots were taken at ISO 1250:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3442/3698536794_a2d2928144_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2642/3698537180_c8e9a1c3f6_o.jpg

I like the character of the noise; like Nikon's approach, the camera seems to be able to kill the chroma noise pretty effectively leaving mostly luminance grain. I do get a feeling that the Olympus software is performing some small amount of NR even with the NR set to "Off" but I am OK with if for now, as I will switch to ACR when it supports the E-P1.



Jul 08, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Sam Bennett
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


I would never try to make a color print with the amount of broad color blotching seen in the ISO 1600 shot. I've found that sort of blotching to be more apparent in a print than it is on the web, etc. If I used this for high ISO work, I'd likely just treat it like I treat my D50 - B&W, most of the time. I don't mind the level of Luminance Noise displayed there, so B&W would be fine.


Jul 08, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Tariq Gibran
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


For 100% crops, I think the results are pretty good at ISO 1600. Olympus has certainly come a long way regarding IQ with this camera.


Jul 08, 2009 at 10:49 AM
jhapeman
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #19 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


Sam Bennett wrote:
I would never try to make a color print with the amount of broad color blotching seen in the ISO 1600 shot. I've found that sort of blotching to be more apparent in a print than it is on the web, etc. If I used this for high ISO work, I'd likely just treat it like I treat my D50 - B&W, most of the time. I don't mind the level of Luminance Noise displayed there, so B&W would be fine.


Remember, this is with NO noise reduction. I think I would be comfortable printing this at smaller sizes, like 8.5"x11", after noise reduction. Of course, the proof will be in the testing. I would definitely agree that the level of grain would make it perfectly suited for B&W up to and including ISO 3200.



Jul 08, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Sam Bennett
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · Twenty Four Hours with the Olympus E-P1


jhapeman wrote:
Remember, this is with NO noise reduction. I think I would be comfortable printing this at smaller sizes, like 8.5"x11", after noise reduction. Of course, the proof will be in the testing. I would definitely agree that the level of grain would make it perfectly suited for B&W up to and including ISO 3200.


I understand. But this does look noise reduced to me, at least in the Color Channels. The pattern is broad enough that in my experience it will be difficult to clean up without losing color fidelity. But as you say, the proof is in the testing. It's certainly not "bad" - so I'd like to see it within my usual workflow before I decide whether its good enough for me. For me, I have no expectation of this camera replacing my D700's. If it can at least hang with the D50 (which from these samples it looks like it easily should, especially given the resolution differences.



Jul 08, 2009 at 11:03 AM
       2       3       end




FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account