MSC Offline Image Upload: On
|
p.1 #23 · Had The Sheriff Called On Me | |
Monito wrote:
j.curtis wrote: I commend the "old lady" for taking action. See saw something suspicious, and instead of ignoring it, she had it investigated.
True, if it was suspicious. It wasn't suspicious. Taking pictures is not suspicious, especially in the situation described.
The silly part about the busybodies and over-reactive police is that it is a waste of their time and taxpayer money.
Anybody wanting to take pictures for nefarious purposes can pretend to be examining text messages on their 5 MegaPixel cell phone and click in an instant as they move it to a vertical position, or click as they appear to put it in their pocket, or upside down as they let their arm hang down, pretending to be temporarily distracted, or in any of a few dozen other ways including the old "take a picture of the tourist in front of the airport" trick. The busybodies will never have a clue.
However, most reports these days are starting to run the way of showing that paranoia has abated and the police are mostly clued in now, and not eager to spend much time harrassing photographers, thank goodness.
The truth is we have no idea of the total story here. We have one side. What is the old lady had little kids and felt that the photographs were stalking her house. Maybe she had been broken into the week before. Maybe, maybe, maybe...
We have a neighbohood watch here like they do all over the nation. People look for behavior that is off the norm. My sister lives on a farm. When they see hunters walking near the property line, they get in the four wheel and go check it out. They remind the poeple of the property line and the No Hunting signs. It is never confrontational, just standard practice for farmers that live in the country.
I've had parents of kids want photos of thier kid taken off my website. Sometimes they are just over the top protective (BTW, I always comply no matter what), and sometimes there is a back story. For example, one mother had a restraining order on the husband was had been convicted for child abuse and now out of prison, had implied to the mom that he was going to take the kid. She did not want the dad to know what team the kid was on. Longshot, sure...better safe than sorry, of course. So I'm not saying this lady was correct, but the truth is, we cannot judge the woman's motives here.
|