From what I gather ( I own 2 Nikon D200s and would welcome an upgrade in AF - both D200s being donated to my sister) the new Nikon D300 is better than a Nikon D2X or even D2Xs in almost every way.......soooo....
does anyone think there might be a $1500 D2X ebay flood?
I can't see myself paying more than $1500 for the D2X with what the D300 is capable of. Is there any error in my logic?
There is kind of another thread on this so Im sorry, but why would someone pay more than $1500 for the D2X ....built in grip? Nah not worth it when the D300 is so much better (on paper).
