fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
  

Archive 2005 · 4 Jack

  
 
jmcfadden
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · 4 Jack


Jack

as you know I am working up a portfolio of images at the request of the shop which markets the curios and memoribilia for this engine. The 261 was the last steam engine built for the Milwaukee Road , delivered out of NY to Minneapolis in 1945 right after WWII. She is a beauty.

Do you think my little D100 images are up to the test , the whole set was shot on my D100 before I knew what a crappy camera it was I just went out and made some really amazing images with it

enjoy

J




Sep 07, 2005 at 12:16 AM
JimFox
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · 4 Jack


Wow!!!! John It's a good thing you didn't know how lousy the D100 was when you shot this, it certainly would have ruined an otherwise awesome photo!!!

This made me think though, when a "great" photo is made I would think it is the result of 80% vision on the part of the photographer, and 20% equipment. So with that calculation, the D100 really could just be a lousy camera, as long as the photographer is good. But then does that mean those with the puffed up egos from that other forum with the superior cameras are really lousy photographers, they just happen to have gotten lucky by chosing that certain camera they tout so much?

Just the ramblings of an owner of a camera that is only 70% of that supposedy lousy D100.

Jim



Sep 07, 2005 at 12:26 AM
jmcfadden
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · 4 Jack


JimFox wrote:
Wow!!!! John It's a good thing you didn't know how lousy the D100 was when you shot this, it certainly would have ruined an otherwise awesome photo!!!

This made me think though, when a "great" photo is made I would think it is the result of 80% vision on the part of the photographer, and 20% equipment. So with that calculation, the D100 really could just be a lousy camera, as long as the photographer is good. But then does that mean those with the puffed up egos from that other forum with the superior cameras are really lousy photographers, they
...Show more


hehe thanks Jim , and errrrr No Comment


J



Sep 07, 2005 at 12:36 AM
cwphoto
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · 4 Jack


Nice train shot John.


Sep 07, 2005 at 12:55 AM
jmcfadden
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · 4 Jack


cwphoto wrote:
Nice train shot John.



thanks man , I am loving going back thru these old images with some new skills up my sleve. These are just stuff from the pile that I thought would be fun to process when I finish the real set it will be fun to post a link here to the work

here is another


J



Sep 07, 2005 at 01:00 AM
Craig B.
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · 4 Jack


Too bad the D100 does not have a "Full Frame" sensor because you would really have something.


Sep 07, 2005 at 01:21 AM
jmcfadden
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · 4 Jack


Craig B. wrote:
Too bad the D100 does not have a "Full Frame" sensor because you would really have something.







Sep 07, 2005 at 08:44 AM
Jack OBrien
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · 4 Jack


John, further proof it's the photographer, not just the camera Like I told you before, this series of images are some of the best train photos I've ever seen. Needless to say, the processing on them was exquisite and done with great finesse.

This is also further proof that ignorance is bliss Now that we know the D100 is a crappy camera, look at how much angst we must suffer

Jack



Sep 07, 2005 at 09:01 AM
jmcfadden
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · 4 Jack


jacko wrote:
This is also further proof that ignorance is bliss Now that we know the D100 is a crappy camera, look at how much angst we must suffer

Jack



yeah Jack , as they say down south . I am "ate up with it " just thinking about it



J



Sep 07, 2005 at 09:09 AM
Stripper
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · 4 Jack


I hope you sell a ton of these prints. Having seen the actual prints of a few of these, I can't imagine that any real RR buff will be able to resist.

I am always amazed at just how good my old D100 RAW files are. I have gone back to them for show and competition images many times. Once you learned the quirks of this camera, you could make amazing pictures with it. Your pictures certainly support this. I don't mind having more resolution and a bigger viewfinder and better AF etc, but I keep going back to my D100 images and smiling.

Congrats Johnny Mac.



Sep 07, 2005 at 09:11 AM
jmcfadden
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · 4 Jack


Stripper wrote:
I hope you sell a ton of these prints. Having seen the actual prints of a few of these, I can't imagine that any real RR buff will be able to resist.

I am always amazed at just how good my old D100 RAW files are. I have gone back to them for show and competition images many times. Once you learned the quirks of this camera, you could make amazing pictures with it. Your pictures certainly support this. I don't mind having more resolution and a bigger viewfinder and better AF etc, but I keep going back to my
...Show more


John

thanks for all the support too my friend. I too really am amazed at the character of the files. I still believe that as far as sheer flexability in post there might not be a better file in that regard. It certainly is a quirky camera. I am so busy right now too , it seems that when it rains it pours. But I hope to make some headway this weekend for sure with the images


J



Sep 07, 2005 at 09:18 AM
lxdesign
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · 4 Jack


Nice images John.... I recently took the grip off of my D100, and I am going to try it without for a while.


Sep 07, 2005 at 09:30 AM
Alan Klages
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · 4 Jack


When I saw your thread's title, I knew it was a choo choo. And what a train it is. As far as I am concerned, they quit building trains when they switched to diesel/electrics. Now with $65 a barrel oil, I would love to see a modern steam locomotive powered by crop residue and canola oil. Paint it yellow and green...no wait a minute, that's John Deere colors.

If my harvest schedule allows, I want to get over to Sumpter, OR about two and a half hours away to shoot their train. It is a narrow gauge steam locomotive that supplied the mining district there. I am friends with one of the volunteer engineers and he can get me a ride. He advised avoiding their photographer's weekend, however it does stop and pose for them in several scenic places making little puffs of smoke and steam at just the right times. To me that is like shooting fish in a barrel.



Sep 07, 2005 at 09:36 AM
jmcfadden
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · 4 Jack


Alan Klages wrote:
When I saw your thread's title, I knew it was a choo choo. And what a train it is. As far as I am concerned, they quit building trains when they switched to diesel/electrics. Now with $65 a barrel oil, I would love to see a modern steam locomotive powered by crop residue and canola oil. Paint it yellow and green...no wait a minute, that's John Deere colors.

If my harvest schedule allows, I want to get over to Sumpter, OR about two and a half hours away to shoot their train. It is a narrow gauge steam locomotive that
...Show more


hehe , I just wished they would run this one a few more times a year Alan. And I really wished they would run her in late October , I would chace her and try to get some shots with nice fall colors throughout . As for steam trains again , sheesh the newer boilers are pretty efficient , I would be all for it

I hope you get over to take some pictures and take a ride too


J



Sep 07, 2005 at 09:43 AM
Jericho
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · 4 Jack


John!

Fantastic man. I love everything about those shots, especially the colors. The tonality of the B&W... AWESOME! Almost surreal in a sense.

Jerry



Sep 07, 2005 at 10:10 AM
oobie
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · 4 Jack


It's hard to imagine, but the prints are even better! Definately the best I've seen.


Sep 07, 2005 at 10:29 AM
Timm
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · 4 Jack


Yeah, J, you know that D100 files barely make an acceptable 20 X 30 print....

I just hope you found a gullible sucker to take that old peice o' junk off your hands!

Some new ones for me here--and beauties!

Alan, give me a call before you head over to Sumpter!

Timm



Sep 07, 2005 at 10:33 AM
chemprof
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #18 · 4 Jack


lxdesign wrote:
Nice images John.... I recently took the grip off of my D100, and I am going to try it without for a while.


Try it, you'll like it! Why have TWO heavy/bulky cameras? What's wrong with less weight and bulk for lugging?

I for one never bothered buying the grip...



Gerald



Sep 07, 2005 at 11:39 AM
Braingiant
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · 4 Jack


John...awesome work. It was amazing to see the 261 that night when Jill and I went over and were able to climb aboard. Again, great work man. I had to "suffer" through long exposures of the engine with the d100 that night A pity

Charlie



Sep 07, 2005 at 01:06 PM
David R
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · 4 Jack


I thought those were great shots, that is until I read your message and then checked the EXIF data. These were taken using a camera with a measely 6MP sensor, and ipso facto, they now suck. Sorry buddy, it's nothing personal. I don't make the rules.


Sep 07, 2005 at 01:23 PM
       2       end




FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account