Morfeus wrote: denoir wrote:
Hmm, that\'s weird. You said you did not do any additional PP? That image is waaay overexposed compared to what you get when you develop the image with default parameters in Lightroom. Here\'s what I get when I develop the raw file without touching the settings, and running a standard resize script:
The file has a non standard profile named \"5d2 large cc wnd\" assigned and the standard values of the file have been changed if opened in LR.
So you are absolutely right, Luka, the file is far from no additional PP.
You have to reset in LR and you\'ll see the overexposed version posted above.
Heinz
I guess if we want a comparison of resizing algorithms, and eliminate other variables, it would be better to all start from the same .jpg instead of a RAW file.
