I think there must be some bad copies of this lens floating around because some people are spectacularly unsatisfied with it, and I\'ve seen some clearly broken-lens images posted elsewhere.
The complaints vary -- one fellow says \"totally unusable at the wide end\", another says it\'s no good focused far away, yet another complains of severe CA.
Some of us, including me, don\'t see any of those problems. Also, some of the people very unhappy with their first copy of the lens like their second copy.
It\'s a lot less likely (to me) that the people posting on this forum (and others) are wrong, and much more likely that Nikon QC is the issue.
Oct 18, 2010 at 08:54 AM
Previous versions of ebrandon's message #8951268 « Another 28-300 test »
