Has to be the Canon for me (I am planning on getting it in the next few weeks). Why? I want a fast wide angle lens in my arsenal, it\'s Canon, it\'s autofocus and from what I\'ve seen, the images it produces have a unique look. I\'ve heard a lot about and seen plenty of images from the Zeiss, but I\'m not convinced it\'s substantially better than the Canon. It\'s slower and it\'s manual focus for about the same money. Not for me.
(Just waiting for the Zeiss camp flak to start raining down! )
Has to be the Canon for me (I am planning on getting it in the next few weeks). Why? I want a fast wide angle lens in my arsenal, it\'s Canon, it\'s autofocus and from what I\'ve seen the images it produces have a unique look. I\'ve heard a lot about and seen plenty of images from the Zeiss, but I\'m not convinced it\'s substantially better than the Canon. It\'s slower and it\'s manual focus for about the same money. Not for me.
(Just waiting for the Zeiss camp flak to start raining down! )
Has to be the Canon for me (I am planning on getting it in the next few weeks). Why? I want a fast wide angle lens in my arsenal, it\'s Canon, it\'s autofocus and from what I\'ve seen the images it produces have a unique look. I\'ve heard a lot about and seen plenty of images from the Zeiss, but I\'m not convinced it\'s substantially better than the Canon. It\'s slower and it\'s manual focus for about the same money. Not for me. (Just waiting for the Zeiss camp flak to start raining down! )
Oct 02, 2010 at 12:22 PM
Previous versions of Sir_Loin's message #8903878 « Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE vs. 24L II, etc. »
