gasrocks wrote:
Unless you are using the Mirex T/S adapter, I do not see a reason to get the 45mm, but that is just me.
I\'ve thought about that ... both ways, and I\'m a bit uncertain about whether I\'ll go with the Mirex just yet (would like to, but ??) ... maybe getting the 45mm would nudge me into the Mirex ??
Other than that, it would basically be my version of an M645 trinity.
I currently have my C/Y 35-70 3.4 filling in at that FL. I\'m thinking about using the 45mm and replacing the 35-70 with the 28mm 2.8 Distagon. Won\'t know for sure until I get a chance to shoot the 45 & the 28 and see how they perform for my tastes, but that\'s at least the current thinking.
While I have multiples of various FL\'s with different mfr\'s ... that would make my lineup something like:
gasrocks wrote:
Unless you are using the Mirex T/S adapter, I do not see a reason to get the 45mm, but that is just me.
I\'ve thought about that ... both ways, and I\'m a bit uncertain about whether I\'ll go with the Mirex just yet (would like to, but ??) ... maybe getting the 45mm would nudge me into the Mirex ??
Other than that, it would basically be my version of an M645 trinity.
I currently have my C/Y 35-70 3.4 filling in at that FL. I\'m thinking about using the 45mm and replacing the 35-70 with the 28mm 2.8 Distagon. Won\'t know for sure until I get a chance to shoot the 45 & the 28 and see how they perform for my tastes, but that\'s at least the current thinking.
While I have multiples of various FL\'s with different mfr\'s ... that would make my lineup something like:
gasrocks wrote:
Unless you are using the Mirex T/S adapter, I do not see a reason to get the 45mm, but that is just me.
I\'ve thought about that ... both ways, and I\'m a bit uncertain about whether I\'ll go with the Mirex just yet (would like to, but ??) ... maybe getting the 45mm would nudge me into the Mirex ??
Other than that, it would basically be my version of an M645 trinity.
I currently have my C/Y 35-70 3.4 filling in at that FL. I\'m thinking about using the 45mm and replacing the 35-70 with the 28mm 2.8 Distagon. Won\'t know for sure until I get a chance to shoot the 45 & the 28 and see how they perform for my tastes, but that\'s at least the current thinking.
While I have multiples of various FL\'s with different mfr\'s ... that would make my lineup something like:
gasrocks wrote:
Unless you are using the Mirex T/S adapter, I do not see a reason to get the 45mm, but that is just me.
I\'ve thought about that ... both ways, and I\'m a bit uncertain about whether I\'ll go with the Mirex just yet (would like to, but ??) ... maybe getting the 45mm would nudge me into the Mirex ??
Other than that, it would basically be my version of an M645 trinity.
I currently have my C/Y 35-70 3.4 filling in at that FL. I\'m thinking about using the 45mm and replacing the 35-70 with the 28mm 2.8 Distagon. Won\'t know for sure until I get a chance to shoot the 45 & the 28 and see how they perform for my tastes, but that\'s at least the current thinking.
While I have multiples of various FL\'s with different mfr\'s ... that would make my lineup something like:
gasrocks wrote:
Unless you are using the Mirex T/S adapter, I do not see a reason to get the 45mm, but that is just me.
I\'ve thought about that ... both ways, and I\'m a bit uncertain about whether I\'ll go with the Mirex just yet (would like to, but ??) ... maybe getting the 45mm would nudge me into the Mirex ??
Other than that, it would basically be my version of an M645 trinity.
I currently have my C/Y 35-70 3.4 filling in at that FL. I\'m thinking about using the 45mm and replacing the 35-70 with the 28mm 2.8 Distagon. Won\'t know for sure until I get a chance to shoot the 45 & the 28 and see how they perform for my tastes, but that\'s at least the current thinking.
While I have multiples of various FL\'s with different mfr\'s ... that would make my lineup something like:
gasrocks wrote:
Unless you are using the Mirex T/S adapter, I do not see a reason to get the 45mm, but that is just me.
I\'ve thought about that ... both ways, and I\'m a bit uncertain about whether I\'ll go with the Mirex just yet (would like to, but ??) ... maybe getting the 45mm would nudge me into the Mirex ??
Other than that, it would basically be my version of an M645 trinity.
I currently have my C/Y 35-70 3.4 filling in at that FL. I\'m thinking about using the 45mm and replacing the 35-70 with the 28mm 2.8 Distagon. Won\'t know for sure until I get a chance to shoot the 45 & the 28 and see how they perform for my tastes, but that\'s at least the current thinking.
While I have multiples of various FL\'s with different mfr\'s ... that would make my lineup something like:
gasrocks wrote:
Unless you are using the Mirex T/S adapter, I do not see a reason to get the 45mm, but that is just me.
I\'ve thought about that ... both ways, and I\'m a bit uncertain about whether I\'ll go with the Mirex just yet (would like to, but ??)
Other than that, it would basically be my version of an M645 trinity.
I currently have my C/Y 35-70 3.4 filling in at that FL. I\'m thinking about using the 45mm and replacing the 35-70 with the 28mm 2.8 Distagon. Won\'t know for sure until I get a chance to shoot the 45 & the 28 and see how they perform for my tastes, but that\'s at least the current thinking.
Feb 13, 2010 at 05:26 PM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #8129559 « M645 45mm ... Which one ?? »
