TRReichman wrote:
If all you currently have is a 24 and 50 then I think the 70-200 would be very useful. If you like the 24 and 50 you might avoid the 35. It was the best lens I never used as I preferred 24mm and 50mm to 35 anytime. Also, I know alot of people use the 85 as their longest lens but I think you\'re really missing out on the tasty goodness at 100-200mm.
- trr
i once had a 70-200 2.8 (non-IS), and was never happy with the quality. I tried out the 135L and was sold. On my 1D Mark II I found it to be a bit long in a lot of circumstances but I imagine on FF it is very different. As much as I want a 85L I am a little nervous with that being my longest lens. Though I do have to option to through it on the 20D. As for the 70-200 2.8 IS I might find myself frustrated with the quality after using the 135L, but can imagine having the IS would be kinda useful!
