talexander wrote:
I find it very funny the side-cracks at me because I didn\'t ask \"why does the 7d suck\" in fact I clearly pointed out the 7d is a huge step forward rivaling the d300 but my question was why isn\'t it better.
The real amusing thing to me here is the apparent hatred for anyone who dares question the true \"innovation\" at canon.
Tim
I guess you assume the D400 is going to be miles ahead of everything! Based on what sony has put out the D400 will be 14 or so MP with most of the same features it already has plus improved video (maybe) and wireless flash) maybe and it will just be the equal to or still not as featured as the 7D, and it will be probably more expensive. There is a part of the market that the 7D and D400 will fit in and anything too much more than that will cost you more money. It\'s simply not equal to the D300, it\'s better! Don\'t know why you keep saying that.
The video options are FAR better on the 7D
More fps on 7D without grip and with 14bit images... what\'s your 14bit fps on the D300? 2.5fps? THat\'s a laugh! HAHA
More resolution on the 7D
Wireless flash system controls more groups on 7D.
Better lens selection unless all you want are the $2400 70-200 or the 14-24mm wide angle.
Again, you asked, we answered, you ignore the points we give.
Sep 01, 2009 at 09:16 AM
Previous versions of droopy1592's message #7480168 « Why isn't the 7D better then the d300? »
