Matt Kerby wrote:
Yikes, that\'s too bad, this guy seems to be a fairly non biased guy.
He is - and he takes some fine pictures.
But something about how he processes images stinks.
He made much the same comment comparing the (then new) 40D with the 30D - \"clearly\" the 40D was a noisier camera than the 30D in his opinion.
Yet in the experience of many of us who own both cameras (I\'ve had my 40D for a year now, and 30Ds for a year before that - and I still have them) the 40D is without question better at high ISO than the 30D.
Not massively better, but significantly better nonetheless. It ain\'t just the amount of noise but the nature of it: 40D noise contains less chroma, and is finer grained, so it affects an image to an observably lesser degree, all other things being equal.
So while I love some of Juza\'s work, I have absolutely no faith whatsoever in his opinion of the noise performance of the 50D compared with the 40D - my belief is that he\'s using the wrong RAW converter...
