Ratios that can differ this much ... I still think the BFA is a piece of the puzzle. Your points are noted, and we'll likely continue to disagree. I've seen ranges that differ by what I would consider to be more than "small" ... when you consider them in context of ratios.
Where there are factors approach 1.5X - 2.0X variance, I'd think that's not what I'd call "small" differences. Sure, the diff between a pair of 0.5's vs. a 0.4 / 0.6 pairing might be "small", but there are examples that extend to a greater difference that I think aren't to be discounted so readily.
Ratios that can differ this much ... I still think the BFA is a piece of the puzzle. Your points are noted, and we'll likely continue to disagree. I've seen ranges that differ by what I would consider to be more than "small" ... when you consider them in context of ratios.
Where there are factors approach 1.5X - 2.0X variance, I'd think that's not what I'd call "small" differences. Sure, the diff between a pair of 0.5's vs. a 0.4 / 0.6 pairing might be "small", but there are examples that extend to a greater difference that I think aren't to be discounted so readily.
Ratios that can differ this much ... I still think the BFA is a piece of the puzzle. Your points are noted, and we'll likely continue to disagree. I've seen ranges that differ by what I would consider to be more than "small" ... when you consider them in context of ratios.
Where there are factors approach 1.5X - 2.0X variance, I'd think that's not what I'd call "small" differences. Sure, the diff between a pair of 0.5's vs. a 0.4 / 0.6 pairing might be "small", but there are examples that extend to a greater difference that I think aren't to be discounted so readily.
Ratios that can differ this much ... I still think the BFA is a piece of the puzzle. Your points are noted, and we'll likely continue to disagree. I've seen ranges that differ by what I would consider to be more than "small" ... when you consider them in context of ratios.
