First rule of digital photography exposure: If you blow something out by over-exposing, you cannot really get it back in post.
So it is generally better to risk underexposure, protect highlights, and deal with the dark areas in post.
Shen photographing birds against bright backgrounds, various problems crop up. In your case, exposing for the birds in soft, shadow light will blow out the sky. (Another common problem is when shooting overhead birds against sky: the camera will underexpose the bird to try to make the large sky area closer to an average value. In this case you often need to "over-expose" the image — if using automatic exposure ou may need to use the EC control to increase exposure 2/3 to a full stop.)
In the case of your photograph you have a couple of choices:
1. You can accept a bit of blown sky, especially when it is very unfocused as in this example. I think that would be an acceptable option in this case since the sky is not particularly central to the image.
2. You can reduce the exposure to whatever degree is necessary to avoid blowing out the sky — that might be at least a stop and perhaps more in this example. Images from contemporary digital cameras can tolerate a lot of pushing of shadows and retain good detail, especially if your ISO isn't too high and if you use tools like the AI Denoise feature in Adobe software.
You can also use some of the powerful masking features in the Adobe apps to apply different levels and types of post-processing to elements of your photograph, at least if you are shooting in raw mode. There are several I'd try with this image — subject, object, or gradient, or even brush... or a combination of those. I'd likely increase the brightness of the birds and other dark areas (consider using a curve adjustment of this) and perhaps warming the color balance a bit.
Another option to play with with this photo: You _could_ consider a tighter crop on the large heron and chick that eliminated the OOF group at the far left along with a bit of the sky. In a way I like those other OOF birds, but they aren't really the main story of this photograph. (That would both tighten the subject focus and possibly allow you to get away with some more global edits to color balance and so forth.)
Regarding camera position, etv. stuff: ome folks — do they actually photograph wildlife, I wonder? — seem to think that you can just set up a shot as you might in the studio and count on a perfect, well-developed composition with ideal lighting. Birds ain't like that... ;-)
As you seem to understand. While we apply experience and location- and critter-knowledge to improve the odds (have the wind at your back when photographing landing birds, get a bit of side light in morning and evening, etc.) birds don't always cooperate all that well, and part of the game is learning how to take the best of what nature gives you and make it work. :-)
First rule of digital photography exposure: If you blow something out by over-exposing, you cannot really get it back in post.
So it is generally better to risk underexposure and protect highlights.
Shen photographing birds against bright backgrounds, various problems crop up. In your case, exposing for the birds in soft, shadow light will blow out the sky. (Another common problem is when shooting overhead birds against sky: the camera will underexpose the bird to try to make the large sky area closer to an average value. In this case you often need to "over-expose" the image — if using automatic exposure ou may need to use the EC control to increase exposure 2/3 to a full stop.)
In the case of your photograph you have a couple of choices:
1. You can accept a bit of blown sky, especially when it is very unfocused as in this example. I think that would be an acceptable option in this case since the sky is not particularly central to the image.
2. You can reduce the exposure to whatever degree is necessary to avoid blowing out the sky — that might be at least a stop and perhaps more in this example. Images from contemporary digital cameras can tolerate a lot of pushing of shadows and retain good detail, especially if your ISO isn't too high and if you use tools like the AI Denoise feature in Adobe software.
You can also use some of the powerful masking features in the Adobe apps to apply different levels and types of post-processing to elements of your photograph, at least if you are shooting in raw mode. There are several I'd try with this image — subject, object, or gradient, or even brush... or a combination of those. I'd likely increase the brightness of the birds and other dark areas (consider using a curve adjustment of this) and perhaps warming the color balance a bit.
Another option to play with with this photo: You _could_ consider a tighter crop on the large heron and chick that eliminated the OOF group at the far left along with a bit of the sky. In a way I like those other OOF birds, but they aren't really the main story of this photograph. (That would both tighten the subject focus and possibly allow you to get away with some more global edits to color balance and so forth.)
Regarding camera position, etv. stuff: ome folks — do they actually photograph wildlife, I wonder? — seem to think that you can just set up a shot as you might in the studio and count on a perfect, well-developed composition with ideal lighting. Birds ain't like that... ;-)
As you seem to understand. While we apply experience and location- and critter-knowledge to improve the odds (have the wind at your back when photographing landing birds, get a bit of side light in morning and evening, etc.) birds don't always cooperate all that well, and part of the game is learning how to take the best of what nature gives you and make it work. :-)
First rule of digital photography: If you blow something out by over-exposing, you cannot really get it back in post.
So it is generally better to risk underexposure and protect highlights.
Shen photographing birds against bright backgrounds, various problems crop up. In your case, exposing for the birds in soft, shadow light will blow out the sky. (Another common problem is when shooting overhead birds against sky: the camera will underexpose the bird to try to make the large sky area closer to an average value. In this case you often need to "over-expose" the image — if using automatic exposure ou may need to use the EC control to increase exposure 2/3 to a full stop.)
In the case of your photograph you have a couple of choices:
1. You can accept a bit of blown sky, especially when it is very unfocused as in this example. I think that would be an acceptable option in this case since the sky is not particularly central to the image.
2. You can reduce the exposure to whatever degree is necessary to avoid blowing out the sky — that might be at least a stop and perhaps more in this example. Images from contemporary digital cameras can tolerate a lot of pushing of shadows and retain good detail, especially if your ISO isn't too high and if you use tools like the AI Denoise feature in Adobe software.
You can also use some of the powerful masking features in the Adobe apps to apply different levels and types of post-processing to elements of your photograph, at least if you are shooting in raw mode. There are several I'd try with this image — subject, object, or gradient, or even brush... or a combination of those. I'd likely increase the brightness of the birds and other dark areas (consider using a curve adjustment of this) and perhaps warming the color balance a bit.
Another option to play with with this photo: You _could_ consider a tighter crop on the large heron and chick that eliminated the OOF group at the far left along with a bit of the sky. In a way I like those other OOF birds, but they aren't really the main story of this photograph. (That would both tighten the subject focus and possibly allow you to get away with some more global edits to color balance and so forth.)
Regarding camera position, etv. stuff: ome folks — do they actually photograph wildlife, I wonder? — seem to think that you can just set up a shot as you might in the studio and count on a perfect, well-developed composition with ideal lighting. Birds ain't like that... ;-)
As you seem to understand. While we apply experience and location- and critter-knowledge to improve the odds (have the wind at your back when photographing landing birds, get a bit of side light in morning and evening, etc.) birds don't always cooperate all that well, and part of the game is learning how to take the best of what nature gives you and make it work. :-)
Great catch of the heron and chick, by the way.
Good luck.
Mar 01, 2026 at 12:56 PM
Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #16995711 « Help with blown skies »
