fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of aCuria's message #16830187 « Sony 50-150mm f/2 GM Image Thread »

  

aCuria
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Sony 50-150mm f/2 GM Image Thread


j4nu wrote:
serhan_ wrote:
Small primes are Samyang 45mm f1.8, 75mm f1.8. & 100mm t2.3 cine lens. I like 100mm t2.3 due to 70mm mfd & 272g weight. I am sure 50-150mm beats the Samyang 100mm wide open but then it doesn't matter for personal use:



aCuria wrote:

Peire wrote:
After testing the GM 50-150/2 yesterday I realized it is not for me.While very well built and having very good/excellent optics it is too (front)heavy,too bulky and has too small RR at each focal lenght for my needs.Fast,small primes/zooms will serve me better.


Do fast small zooms exist in this range?

105/1.4, 135/1.8, 85/1.4 are not small

There’s the 90/2.8 but that’s not fast




Yes, there's 135/1.8 small or 85/1.4 small or 150/2 small ...





https://camerasize.com/compact/#937.660,937.1205,937.820,937.1164,ha,t


The 135/1.8 prime is 1030g and my experience is that it has to be switched frequently for a 50/65/85mm or something, In some situations its exceedingly hard to use 135, especially if the subject is uncooperative (kids / dogs running around).

50-150 is 1340g (300g more than the 135/1.8) and the lens switching can be avoided completely for this kind of subject

To me the closest lens is the 70-200GMii. f/2 means one stop better low light auto focus, and an extra 300g for one stop is often worth paying. This is the weight difference between a 35/1.8 and 35/1.4

The downside is that video is going to be better on the 70-200 because of OSS, and the extra weight means getting tired faster. For more distant subjects having 200/2.8 is somewhat better than cropping from 150.

The biggest issue is the cost imo... I don't think it costs much more to make than the 70-200GMii, it would be better if priced more similarly.



Jun 09, 2025 at 04:30 AM





  Previous versions of aCuria's message #16830187 « Sony 50-150mm f/2 GM Image Thread »