RoamingScott wrote: thrice wrote:
Let me preface this by saying I mean no offense to any of the photographers who have posted in this thread, there is nothing wrong with your work and it would be great on any camera - I am purely sharing my critique of imaging characteristics of the camera as I see them.
Am I the only one to notice that the RF images look very sterile/digital? I am a fan of both film and digital but I like an organic or perhaps 'imperfect' rendering that can appear characterful. It may be that the right lighting has not presented itself to the early adopters, but the majority of photos - other than sharpness/resolution - look like they could have been shot on an iphone.
If I'm way off the mark, or others disagree with me, please, share images that show some interesting rendering, or feel free to link me to a collection somewhere. It just seems like the camera is a little soulless.
I've been saying this since the first samples came out. Not really a camera that you can rely on to make your images interesting, as examples here and elsewhere have proved. The photographer has to do that. It's the Leica problem
Every photo presented thus far as a best case scenario is decidedly middling to my eye compared to what you could get for the same money elsewhere.
Did you ever take a pic / process / print with the one you bought? Or, are you merely judging from website postings?
May 21, 2025 at 09:01 AM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #16819162 « Fujifilm GFX100RF Discussion and Image Thread »
