MF can't do significant better in IQ (not that huge difference in sensor size), but far less versatile than Sony.
I disagree with that take, Sir. For the 1000th time in my MF shooting career I will correct an OP on a camera equipment forum that mistakenly claims that the MF sensor that GFX and Hassy use is not "that much bigger" than our beloved FF sensor size.
That is incorrect. It is a lot bigger. It is 70% bigger and size matters.
Why else would we spend so much money on GFX gear?
I know why. It is because the IQ / image fidelity is much better. How much better? A lot better. And the glass is the best there is.
So that leads me to disagree with your statement that the IQ is not significantly better. It is. Oh yes indeed it is.
Now if you really believe what you are saying and really can't see it, then I suggest that you are lucky. Save your money and buy more Sony gear because GFX would be a total waste of your time, effort and money.
I do agree with you that GFX is less versatile than FF for some things sports, racing, BIF & wildlife, but it is much better for what it is good at, which is a lot.
Tools for the job at hand.
Like I always say, if you don't need or appreciate the significant gains in res and IQ or if you don't want to (or can't) spend the big bucks, then don't get GFX or Hassy. Stay away from it because it can be a bit like heroin (but won't kill you). Instead, shoot FF or Fuji X and be happy. Those systems are great.
I did not say this. You somehow mucked around with the quoting and made it look like I said that.
Classy move.
For the record, I did not post what this person attributed to me.
Mar 29, 2025 at 05:32 AM
Previous versions of tsdevine's message #16783324 « Fujifilm GFX100RF Discussion and Image Thread »
