rick-reno wrote:
There are a few reviews praising the Z 70-200 and comparing to the f mount 70-200 E. Nasim Mansurov
at Photography Life did a review of the F4 70-200, and they reviewed the Z 70-200. You could compare their MTF data and maybe get an idea of what you're looking for.
I guess the OP is more interested in out-of-focus rendition than in lp/mm: falconbach wrote:
I can't find any comparison between those two lenses, specially bokeh wide open. I will mostly use it for pet and action photography.
Anyway, I think it's easily predictable that the Z 70-200/2.8 S is a superior lens; the f/2.8 aperture should guarantee better bokeh w/open and a more responsive AF. I own the AF-S 70-200/4G, and it's a very good lens; however, for action photography a f/2.8 lens would be preferable.
Nikon D700 w/AF-S ED 70-200/4G VR @ 200 mm, f/4, 1/20 s, 2500 ISO
Nikon D780 w/AF-S ED 70-200/4G VR @ 160 mm, f/4, 1/1600 s, 100 ISO
Sep 06, 2024 at 03:50 AM
Previous versions of Ripolini's message #16634956 « Nikon Z 70-200 f/2.8 s vs Nikon 70-200 f/4 »
