Re: A7c vs A7c II - Q for those who have shot with both
Joseph Marney wrote: aCuria wrote:
IMO it’s hard to justify either when you have the RV.
The RV is a 203g heavier than the Cii, but that’s the weight of the nicer screen, better viewfinder, better ibis, mechanical shutter, extra card slot and a more ergonomic body
203g is a very small weight penalty for these features… leave one ND filter + step down ring at home and that covers the 200g
Aside from the weight (which isn't nothing - you can add a Sonnar 35mm and still be lighter than the RV) the A7C/II have a substantially smaller footprint. With a compact lens, I anticipate being able to slide the A7C into a coat pocket. Perhaps I'm wrong on that, though.
Once you add the lens it’s the same imo. The grip only looks big when there isn’t a lens attached
Yes the nicer viewfinder takes up some space up top, but it’s not like you can use a smaller camera bag as a result.
Re: A7c vs A7c II - Q for those who have shot with both
Joseph Marney wrote: aCuria wrote:
IMO it’s hard to justify either when you have the RV.
The RV is a 203g heavier than the Cii, but that’s the weight of the nicer screen, better viewfinder, better ibis, mechanical shutter, extra card slot and a more ergonomic body
203g is a very small weight penalty for these features… leave one ND filter + step down ring at home and that covers the 200g
Aside from the weight (which isn't nothing - you can add a Sonnar 35mm and still be lighter than the RV) the A7C/II have a substantially smaller footprint. With a compact lens, I anticipate being able to slide the A7C into a coat pocket. Perhaps I'm wrong on that, though.
Once you add the lens it’s the same imo. The grip only looks big when there isn’t a lens attached
Yes the nicer viewfinder takes up some space up top, but it’s not like you can use a smaller camera bag as a result.
