JadedWriter wrote:
If I cared about who made my sensors I'd be shooting Canon and not Nikon and Fujifilm. I don't care. I really wish you people would stop trotting out the "but Sony makes the sensors" line. It's petty and you just want the final word in the discussion.
Also to further clarify:
I shot Nikon first, Fuji second basically a year after I started photography and Sony third down the line. I consider Nikon and Fuji the root of my photography. I don't care who makes their sensors. 1bwana1 wrote: JadedWriter wrote:
I knew I didn't like Sony's product support when I had the A7RIV. I never liked Sony's camera logistics enough to invest in a 4-6 thousand dollar camera. It's different strokes for different folks. Sony is going to Sony, one either likes it or they don't. I used the stuff for years and realized I didn't like Sony's ethos so bailed. Support the company that does what you like. Not try to force a product to make what you want. Vote with your wallet. Some people feel stuck in Sony and just are in an endless Sony cycle of love hate and taking it out on other brands. It is what it is.
But as you know, you are still voting with your wallet in favor of Sony when you buy a Nikon. There seems to be no getting around that in the current World of iCL cameras.
I always got good service and support from Nikon, and see no difference with Sony so far. Both very good companies, with nice products these days.
In the scope of hobby costs, as cheap as camera equipment is, I don't think many feel stuck in one system or another.
Yep. It's the same as saying iPhone users are also shooting TSMC, Samsung or Sony depending on which parts they use. If anything, that's also an insult to Samsung and Sony because in blind tests, Samsung and Sony phones do often churn out better images than the iPhone.
The image processing engine is that brain that churns out the image.
JadedWriter wrote:
If I cared about who made my sensors I'd be shooting Canon and not Nikon and Fujifilm. I don't care. I really wish you people would stop trotting out the "but Sony makes the sensors" line. It's petty and you just want the final word in the discussion.
Also to further clarify:
I shot Nikon first, Fuji second basically a year after I started photography and Sony third down the line. I consider Nikon and Fuji the root of my photography. I don't care who makes their sensors. 1bwana1 wrote: JadedWriter wrote:
I knew I didn't like Sony's product support when I had the A7RIV. I never liked Sony's camera logistics enough to invest in a 4-6 thousand dollar camera. It's different strokes for different folks. Sony is going to Sony, one either likes it or they don't. I used the stuff for years and realized I didn't like Sony's ethos so bailed. Support the company that does what you like. Not try to force a product to make what you want. Vote with your wallet. Some people feel stuck in Sony and just are in an endless Sony cycle of love hate and taking it out on other brands. It is what it is.
But as you know, you are still voting with your wallet in favor of Sony when you buy a Nikon. There seems to be no getting around that in the current World of iCL cameras.
I always got good service and support from Nikon, and see no difference with Sony so far. Both very good companies, with nice products these days.
In the scope of hobby costs, as cheap as camera equipment is, I don't think many feel stuck in one system or another.
Yep. It's the same as saying iPhone users are also shooting Samsung or Sony depending on which parts they use. If anything, that's also an insult to Samsung and Sony because in blind tests, Samsung and Sony phones do often churn out better images than the iPhone.
Apr 02, 2024 at 08:22 AM
Previous versions of unchecked's message #16513894 « Finally, Z6 III rumors »
