molson wrote: BidinTime wrote:
Yep, the people who pay retail and aren't on the company payroll. Hopefully they'll be honest. Of course, early adopters often have confirmation bias so ...
tntcorp1 wrote:
BidinTime wrote:
tntcorp1 wrote:
new name to differentiate but historical reference for brand affilation/recognition.
i liked the variable gradient filter option in the new om-1ii.
Manage your expectations. As we've seen with the OM-1, the parlor tricks don't live up to the marketing hype.
sure, i'll be waiting on feedbacks from actual users. 👍
Unfortunately, the people who are emotionally crippled by buyer's remorse are even less reliable as sources of unbiased information...
why do some folks love to use the word biased/unbiased as though using it makes them the default high winner of ongoing or future arguments?
--my sentence included the word biased/unbiased first so I win!!! I am the credible one. my argument is impeccible.
what 'people' do you expect will be unbiased about any product they've purchased from a company other than those whom have never purchased a product from any particular company/brand before?
I buy m4/3 stuff because i like the stuff because it gives me great results. I've been buying m4/3 stuff for a decade.
I am biased aren't I?
therefor, I surely am a liar too right when I share my experience and preference for m4/3 with others.
so...someone who has never used/purchased m4/3 equipment before....they are surely unbiased to m4/3 and it's manufactures, correct?
after the first hour of use they arrive on the interweb to report that their m4/3 eqiupment is garbage...that surely is the best genuine and most sound unbiased advice isn't it?
there is an '...' nice person on another web forum who uses Nikon and Sony and also has 2 (or 3) OM-1s. he always insists there is an AF problem with BOTH of his OM-1s because they both do not do some specific thing that the Nikon and Sony do. he's gotta be correct right? i mean surely he knows how to best set up the OM-1s to best suit his requirements of them. and surely so would someone (a new m4/3 user) who just opened up the box and turned the camera on for an hour.
molson wrote: BidinTime wrote:
Yep, the people who pay retail and aren't on the company payroll. Hopefully they'll be honest. Of course, early adopters often have confirmation bias so ...
tntcorp1 wrote:
BidinTime wrote:
tntcorp1 wrote:
new name to differentiate but historical reference for brand affilation/recognition.
i liked the variable gradient filter option in the new om-1ii.
Manage your expectations. As we've seen with the OM-1, the parlor tricks don't live up to the marketing hype.
sure, i'll be waiting on feedbacks from actual users. 👍
Unfortunately, the people who are emotionally crippled by buyer's remorse are even less reliable as sources of unbiased information...
why do some folks love to use the word biased/unbiased as though using it makes them the default high winner of ongoing or future arguments?
--my sentence included the word biased/unbiased first so I win!!! I am the credible one. my argument is impeccible.
what 'people' do you expect will be unbiased about any product they've purchased from a company other than those whom have never purchased a product from any particular company/brand before?
I buy m4/3 stuff because i like the stuff because it gives me great results. I've been buying m4/3 stuff for a decade.
I am biased aren't I?
therefor, I am a liar too right?
so...someone who has never used/purchased m4/3 equipment before....they are surely unbiased to m4/3 and it's manufactures, correct?
after the first hour of use they arrive on the interweb to report that their m4/3 eqiupment is garbage...that surely is the best genuine and most sound unbiased advice isn't it?
there is an '...' nice person on another web forum who uses Nikon and Sony and also has 2 (or 3) OM-1s. he always insists there is an AF problem with BOTH of his OM-1s because they both do not do some specific thing that the Nikon and Sony do. he's gotta be correct right? i mean surely he knows how to best set up the OM-1s to best suit his requirements of them. and surely so would someone (a new m4/3 user) who just opened up the box and turned the camera on for an hour.
Feb 17, 2024 at 02:45 PM
Previous versions of Paul_100A's message #16473745 « OM Systems nearly 100 in the business? »
