Re: Why was the larger Z mount necessary, exactly?
AcuteShadows wrote:
Nikon is comparing the size to the F mount lenses referred to in this paragraph, not to any lenses from other manufacturers.
That is just one of the quotes that I linked to where Nikon was explicite in this regard.
That is however what I have been saying in this thread. But, many people are mistaking Nikon saying that means that the Z mount offers advantages in size and weight to other manufactures mounts. Nikon is not saying that although tmarketing often leaves that distinction kind of fuzzy. It is that unfactual extension of those statements that I am discussing here. That particular advantage has not proven to be valid at this point.
It seems to me that we basically agree.
Sep 02, 2023 at 08:15 PM
Previous versions of 1bwana1's message #16332451 « Why was the larger Z mount necessary, exactly? »
