Re: Why was the larger Z mount necessary, exactly?
So, you think these two guys know what the future is like, and what we may see, and what Nikon, or any other manufacturer plans are about?
They can say whatever they want, but I still think, Nikon didn't go stupid to make it as big just for marketing purposes, it's got to be more to it.
They're guessing just like all of us..
BTW, I stopped watching these guys couple of years back, they don't bring any new value, as CanadaMark described above, they're just dragging on the surface without getting into the depth of the subject.
Their channel, as some others similar to it, is setup for people with very limited knowledge, they know where the numbers are.
So, they're not those who would convince me on this particular subject, sorry.
These kind of guys would prize anything Sony brings on the market with perfect color.
Then, it takes a few years, until we learn that Sony 200-600mm is actually 200-550mm.
Re: Why was the larger Z mount necessary, exactly?
So, you think these two guys know what the future is like, and what we may see, and what Nikon, or any other manufacturer plans are about?
They can say whatever they want, but I still think, Nikon didn't go stupid to make it as big just for marketing purposes, it's got to be more to it.
They're guessing just like all of us..
BTW, I stopped watching these guys couple of years back, they don't bring any new value, as CanadaMark described above, they're just dragging on the surface without getting into the depth of the subject.
Their channel, as some others similar to it, is setup for people with very limited knowledge, they know where the numbers are.
So, they're not those who would convince me on this particular subject, sorry.
Aug 31, 2023 at 04:47 PM
Previous versions of cvrle59's message #16330558 « Why was the larger Z mount necessary, exactly? »
