Lens: Don't know. It could have been a 105 micro Nikkor, or any of the EDIF 300's (2.8 or 4)
___________
An edit, 3 days after the thread was started:
Please post images that were recorded on any type of film/transparency (at any ASA) and converted to digital by any means.
I think we are all curious to know what tools/techniques you used to digitize the original film.
I checked the EXIF box on this snake image, and the model number of my Nikon scanner was imbedded below the image.
I suspect the Nikon ES-1 or ES-2 and a digital camera do as good a job as the Nikon scanner. But I do not know for certain if this is true, because I have not yet digitized any with the ES 1 or 2 and a camera.
I wonder if some guys have noise in some of their images after converting them to digital.
Lens: Don't know. It could have been a 105 micro Nikkor, or any of the EDIF 300's (2.8 or 4)
___________
An edit, 3 days after the thread was started:
Please post images that were recorded on any type of film/transparency (at any ASA) and converted to digital by any means.
I think we are all curious to know what tools/techniques you used to digitize the original film.
I checked the EXIF box on this snake image, and the Nikon scanner model name was imbedded.
I suspect the Nikon ES-1 or ES-2 and a digital camera do as good a job as the Nikon scanner. But I do not know for certain if this is true, because I have not yet digitized any with the ES 1 or 2 and a camera.
I wonder if some guys have noise in some of their images after converting them to digital.
Lens: Don't know. It could have been a 105 micro Nikkor, or any of the EDIF 300's (2.8 or 4)
___________
An edit, 3 days after the thread was started:
Please post images that were recorded on any type of film/transparency (at any ASA) and converted to digital by any means.
I think we are all curious to know what tools/techniques you used to digitize the original film.
This snake image happened to have EXIF data embedded, showing it was digitized with a Nikon scanner. I suspect the Nikon ES-1 or ES-2 and a digital camera do as good a job as the Nikon scanner. But I do not know for certain if this is true, because I have not yet digitized any with the ES 1 or 2 and a camera.
I wonder if some guys have noise in some of their images after converting them to digital.
Lens: Don't know. It could have been a 105 micro Nikkor, or any of the EDIF 300's (2.8 or 4)
___________
An edit, 3 days after the thread was started:
Please post images that were recorded on any type of film/transparency (at any ASA) and converted to digital by any means.
I think we are all curious to know what tools/techniques you used to digitize the original film.
This snake image happened to have EXIF data embedded, showing it was digitized with a Nikon scanner. I suspect the Nikon ES-1 or ES-2 and a digital camera do as good a job as the Nikon scanner. But I do not know for certain if this is true, because I have not yet digitized any with the ES 1 or 2 and a camera.
What I want to know is if you guys had noise after converting your images to digital.
Lens: Don't know. It could have been a 105 micro Nikkor, or any of the EDIF 300's (2.8 or 4)
___________
An edit, 3 days after the thread was started:
Please post images that were recorded on any type of film/transparency (at any ASA) and converted to digital by any means.
I think we are all curious what tools/techniques you used to digitize the original film.
This snake image happened to have EXIF data embedded, showing it was digitized with a Nikon scanner. I suspect the Nikon ES-1 or ES-2 and a digital camera do as good a job as the Nikon scanner. But I do not know for certain if this is true, because I have not yet digitized any with the ES 1 or 2 and a camera.
What I want to know is if you guys had noise after converting your images to digital.
Lens: Don't know. It could have been a 105 micro Nikkor, or any of the EDIF 300's (2.8 or 4)
___________
An edit, 3 days after the thread was started:
Please post images that were recorded on any type of film/transparency (at any ASA) and converted to digital by any means.
I think we are all curious what tools/techniques you used to digitize the original film.
This snake image happened to have EXIF data embedded, showing it was digitized with a Nikon scanner. I suspect the ES-1 or ES-2 and a digital camera do as good a job as the Nikon scanner. But I do not know for certain if this is true, because I have not digitized any with the ES 1 or 2 and a camera (yet).
Lens: Don't know. It could have been a 105 micro Nikkor, or any of the EDIF 300's (2.8 or 4)
___________
An edit, 3 days after the thread was started:
Please post images that were recorded on any type of film/transparency (at any ASA) and converted to digital by any means.
I think we are all curious what tools/techniques you used to digitize the original film.
This snake image happened to have EXIF data embedded, showing it was digitized with a Nikon scanner. I suspect the Nikon scanner does any better job than the ES-1 or ES-2 and a digital camera. But I do not know for certain if this is true, because I have not digitized any with the ES 1 or 2 and a camera (yet).
).