The 85/1.4 certainly has its detractors, but I always thought it has wonderful character and liked it a lot. I say this having owned a couple of 200/2.0s and the 105/1.4E. I can't speak for the Sigma, aside from to say that the several Art-series lenses I've shot have been nice pieces of glass, if a little sterile.
The 85/1.4 certainly has its detractors, but I always liked it a lot. I say this having owned a couple of 200/2.0s and the 105/1.4E. I can't speak for the Sigma, aside from to say that the several Art-series lenses I've shot have been nice pieces of glass, if a little sterile.
The 85/1.4 certainly has its detractors, but I always liked it a lot. I say this having owned a couple of 200/2.0s and the 105/1.4E. I can't speak for the Sigma, aside from to say that the several Art-series lenses I've shot have been nice pieces of glass.
The 85/1.4 certainly has its detractors, but I always liked it a lot. I say this having owned and shot a couple of 200/2.0s and the 105/1.4E. Can't really speak for the Sigma, aside from to say that the several Art-series versions I've shot have been nice pieces of glass.
C
Dec 06, 2022 at 01:25 AM
Previous versions of Chris Court's message #16112346 « Sigma 105mm 1.4 vs Nikon 85mm 1.4 G »
