I went ahead and took some fast shots this morning (mosquitos not worth) to quick compare to GF45:
-GFX100
-ISO 640
-SS Auto
-IBIS ON Handheld
-ES
-C1 22, default, only WB match (clicked in center gray area)
NOTE: It does cover the full sensor just so, thus if you have IBIS on and you're moving around it will introduce vignette due to the image circle moving.
GF45 had a UV filter that could have affected sharpness/WB but it's close enough
Basically, resolution seems to be on par with what they claim. GF45 is better if you 420% pixel peep. I didn't crop any of the edges or corners, but basically they are the same as the GF45 if not better (probably just more DoF though).
I went ahead and took some fast shots this morning (mosquitos not worth) to quick compare to GF45:
-GFX100
-ISO 640
-SS Auto
-IBIS ON Handheld
-ES
-C1 22, default, only WB match (clicked in center gray area)
NOTE: It does cover the full sensor just so, thus if you have IBIS on and you're moving around it will introduce vignette due to the image circle moving.
GF45 had a UV filter that could have affected sharpness/WB but it's close enough
Basically, resolution seems to be on par with what they claim. GF45 is better if you 420% pixel peep. I didn't crop any of the edges or corners, but basically they are the same as the GF45 if not better (probably just more DoF though).
Aug 15, 2022 at 09:54 AM
Previous versions of ftllens's message #16017784 « AstrHori 24mm and 40mm pancake for Leica M »
