I think the picture has a lot of 3d pop. I thought about why that is. It doesn't have much to do with editing with LR. The RAW has the same effect. It doesn't have much to do with the sharpness gradient either. The picture was taken with f2. The sharpness goes to the door handle of the passenger door. But I also took the picture with f2.8. The entire vehicle is sharp here. Nevertheless, the same 3d pop can also be seen here.
To me, the pop is somewhat reduced by whatever you did to the top of the roof. It should not be out of focus based on DOF in the rest of the image.
I don't understand your comment. Why should the rest of the picture be in focus? Here the picture is completely unprocessed and only converted from RAW to JPG. If you wish, I can also provide the RAW.
I think the picture has a lot of 3d pop. I thought about why that is. It doesn't have much to do with editing with LR. The RAW has the same effect. It doesn't have much to do with the sharpness gradient either. The picture was taken with f2. The sharpness goes to the door handle of the passenger door. But I also took the picture with f2.8. The entire vehicle is sharp here. Nevertheless, the same 3d pop can also be seen here.
To me, the pop is somewhat reduced by whatever you did to the top of the roof. It should not be out of focus based on DOF in the rest of the image.
I don't understand your comment. Why should the rest of the picture be in focus? Here the picture is completely unprocessed and only converted from RAW to JPG. If you wish, I can also provide the RAW.
