Sigmas are still looking strong in comparison owing to their under-corrected SA. I don’t think I’ll bite on any of the sigmas or Sony G trio though until a high megapixel a7c variant appears. By then there will be more definitive takes on all these options no doubt.
In the meantime, for me, the near optical perfection in the CV APO line for a few hundred more per lens is a better trade off in the small sized categories even without AF.
Sigmas are still looking strong in comparison owing to their under-corrected SA. I don’t think I’ll bite on any of the sigmas or Sony G trio though until a high megapixel a7c variant appears. By then there will be more definitive takes on all these options no doubt.
In the meantime, for me, the near optical perfection in the CV APO line for a few hundred more per lens is a better trade off given size:
Sigmas are still looking strong in comparison owing to their under-corrected SA. I don’t think I’ll bite on any of the sigmas or Sony G trio though until a high megapixel a7c variant. By then there will be more definitive takes on all these options no doubt.
For me optical perfection in the CV APO line for a few hundred more per lens is a better trade off given size:
Mar 23, 2021 at 02:35 PM
Previous versions of Justin Stone's message #15541999 « Pre-order Sony G lenses: FE 24mm f/2.8, 40mm f/2.5, 50mm f/2.5 »
