fredmiranda.com
Login
Edit history

Pre-order: Sony FE 50mm f/1.2 GM ($1,998)

Message #15534759 by Buckeye2604 · 1 earlier version stored · newest first

Back to the post
Current versionSaved Mar 16, 2021 at 10:57 PMTitle changed
Pre-order: Sony FE 50mm f/1.2 GM ($1,998)
Holger wrote:
j4nu wroteI think I can live with heavy vignetting or focus breathing as I don't care too much for those but 2 things from lenstip review might affect overall picture quality imho:
* rather unexpected astigmatism
* moustache distortion.
Not deal breakers, but something to keep in mind I think.
The Canon has clearly more vignetting, half a stop more (if opticallimits is correct), look after 6:15 in Manny's video, too. Looks like the Sony is comparable to the Nikon, here.
Distortion is a bit higher (0.6% vs. 0.25% (Nikon) vs. 0.2% (Canon)), but nothing to be concerned about , imo. I think Sony went the Sigma route in trading size for distortion.

CAs look indeed well controlled. I expected the Nikon, due to its size, to be better:
https://www.cameralabs.com/nikon-z-50mm-f1-2-s-review/2/
But that doesn't seem to be the case.

I like Manny but it’s seems pretty clear he had vignette control enabled on Sony (-2.9ev per lenstip) and Nikon (maybe?) but not Canon (-3.2ev per optical limits). Less than a half stop difference wouldn’t be the drastic difference shown in his examples - we don’t know his exposure either. I like to leave the technical reviews to the sites that repeat those types of tests frequently and influencer YouTube videos for entertainment.
Original postPosted Mar 16, 2021 at 10:45 PM
Re: Sony 50mm f/1.2 GM
Holger wrote:
j4nu wroteI think I can live with heavy vignetting or focus breathing as I don't care too much for those but 2 things from lenstip review might affect overall picture quality imho:
* rather unexpected astigmatism
* moustache distortion.
Not deal breakers, but something to keep in mind I think.
The Canon has clearly more vignetting, half a stop more (if opticallimits is correct), look after 6:15 in Manny's video, too. Looks like the Sony is comparable to the Nikon, here.
Distortion is a bit higher (0.6% vs. 0.25% (Nikon) vs. 0.2% (Canon)), but nothing to be concerned about , imo. I think Sony went the Sigma route in trading size for distortion.

CAs look indeed well controlled. I expected the Nikon, due to its size, to be better:
https://www.cameralabs.com/nikon-z-50mm-f1-2-s-review/2/
But that doesn't seem to be the case.

I like Manny but it’s seems pretty clear he had vignette control enabled on Sony (-2.9ev per lenstip) and Nikon (maybe?) but not Canon (-3.2ev per optical limits). Less than a half stop difference wouldn’t be the drastic difference shown in his examples - we don’t know his exposure either. Leave the technical reviews to the sites that repeat those types of tests frequently and influencer YouTube videos for entertainment.

Back to the post

Switch to mobile view