|
|
DavidBM wrote:
nehemiahphoto wroteDavidBM wrotePhillip Reeve wrotenehemiahphoto wrotePhillip Reeve wroteVery interesting, thanks for the work and I look forward to the reveal  
Bokeh at 0.6 meters: 5, 4 (good), the rest pretty busy with no clear order
Bokeh/background at 1.2 meters: 5,1, the rest in no particular order
Flare: 4, 5, the rest in no particular order
Bokeh and transition at f2 at 10-12 feet: 1, 4, 5 are mostly smooth, the rest a little nervous but not a big difference overall
F8 with tree (focal point) 12 feet away: 1 and 3 with foreground in focus and background out of focus towards the corners. I prefer the others.
Transition Zone: 3 and 6 ahead, the rest in no particular order
For my preference I would probably weight the different scenes 1: 15%, 2: 45%, 3: 15%, 4: 5%, 5: 10%, 6: 10%
I hope the Sigma 2/35 comes out well, I just bought one yesterday on David's recommendation 
Or the whole image just feels a little bit darker than it should for an F2
I noticed both as well, the whole image is dark with high degrees of vignetting outside the center of the frame though, as you say, it is not abrupt. Shooting these multiple lenses on a tripod, the sigma is always darker by about a half stop. Interestingly, the RX1 vignettes less than the ILC lenses so there’s about a stop difference between the 35i and RX1 even though they are both the same focal length and f-stop technically. I guess that’s why some measure t-stops as well.
It is a bummer for astro. And the 35i is very well corrected for coma too.
It’s funny you say that, I feel like depending on the distance or something I either get more depth of field or less DOG than I should. It’s a little bit confusing. I think I will shoot it against the RX1 just watch the focus fall off.
|
