Here obviously, I get into the reasons why one would want to consider the f1 range of lens choices vs f2 range of lens choices.
Obviously, there are also others to consider - many others. I have owned and used the Fuji 56 f1.2 lens in concert photography also. But besides that lens, there's Viltrox and Sigma f1.4 lenses in this range for Fuji.
What I think is critical to me are probably the same things for most of you: fast af and follow fast AF - plus IQ. IQ matters when the DOF is this thin in a f1.0 lens. What is acceptable sharpness vs tack sharp - becomes a factor to consider. If you can shoot at 5000 ISO vs 12,800 - does that become more important than the relatively wider DOF of f2? Well, with the f1.0 lens, you can always shoot at f2 if you want. But with an F2 lens, you can't open up any more that f2.
Here obviously, I get into the reasons why one would want to consider the f1 range of lens choices vs f2 range of lens choices.
Obviously, there are also others to consider - many others. I have owned and used the Fuji 56 f1.2 lens in concert photography also. But besides that lens, there's Viltrox and Sigma f1.4 lenses in this range for Fuji.
What I think is critical to me are probably the same things for most of you: fast af and follow fast AF - plus IQ. IQ matters when the DOF is this thing in a f1.0 lens. What is acceptable sharpness vs tack sharp - becomes a factor to consider. If you can shoot at 5000 ISO vs 12,800 - does that become more important than the relatively wider DOF of f2? Well, with the f1.0 lens, you can always shoot at f2 if you want. But with an F2 lens, you can't open up any more that f2.
