molson wrote:
Chris and Jordan were pretty harsh, picking this as the worst lens of 2020...
https://www.dpreview.com/videos/3740301881/dpreview-tv-the-best-and-worst-cameras-and-lenses-of-2020
Two drunk guys throwing backs shots saying what are the best and worst of the year. Entertaining.
So, moving on, here are some shots from the undefeated Lansing girls HS basketball. I included a series so you could see how it was working on follow focus. Where f1.0 may be too shallow for some, if there is room in the exposure, opening up to f2 allows for more DOF on more players. It's. point of choice and perhaps taste. I found that the quality of the lens helped hold the images together to an acceptable focus. Sharper can always be achieved with auxiliary lighting of course. But the lens is no doubt sharp and responsive for sports action as long as one works with the focus tracking menu options that work best for that photographer. The performance is best also, for me, with the updated firmware with the X-T4 optimized to work with the 50mm f1.0.
X-T4 files are really nice - croppable - and I believe the 50mm f1.0 benefits from the IBIS.
The only shots taken in the study of this series were by the players on the court.

X-T4 XF50mmF1.0 R WR lens 50mm f/1.0 1/2000s 4000 ISO 0.0 EV

X-T4 XF50mmF1.0 R WR lens 50mm f/1.0 1/2000s 4000 ISO 0.0 EV

X-T4 XF50mmF1.0 R WR lens 50mm f/2.0 1/1000s 4000 ISO 0.0 EV

X-T4 XF50mmF1.0 R WR lens 50mm f/2.0 1/1000s 4000 ISO 0.0 EV

X-T4 XF50mmF1.0 R WR lens 50mm f/2.0 1/1000s 4000 ISO 0.0 EV

X-T4 XF50mmF1.0 R WR lens 50mm f/2.0 1/1000s 4000 ISO 0.0 EV

X-T4 XF50mmF1.0 R WR lens 50mm f/2.0 1/1000s 4000 ISO 0.0 EV

X-T4 XF50mmF1.0 R WR lens 50mm f/2.0 1/1000s 4000 ISO 0.0 EV